HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pozdnyakova, L. Articles by Oudemans, P. V. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Pozdnyakova, L. Articles by Oudemans, P. V. Agricola Articles by Pozdnyakova, L. Articles by Oudemans, P. V. Related Collections Fractal Approaches Spatial Variability Production Agriculture Spatial Distribution

Spatial Analysis of Cranberry Yield at Three Scales

^a P.E. Marucci Center for Blue/Cranberry Res. and Ext., Rutgers Univ., 125A Lake Oswego Rd., Chatsworth, NJ 08019-2006
^b Dep. of Environ. Sciences, Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, NJ

View larger version (38K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Major part of the study area near Chatsworth, NJ. Total yield for entire fields was used to evaluate large scale variability. Shaded are 21 fields with dense sampling to account for within field variability (medium scale).

View larger version (17K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Example of the fit of the log |Zx – Zx+h|q vs. log (h) for different q, data for small scale yield variability.

View larger version (43K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Histogram of cranberry yield data for the small scale variation.

View larger version (10K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Semivariogram of cranberry yield at the small scale.

View larger version (13K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Semivariogram of cranberry yield at the large scale.

View larger version (22K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Semivariograms of cranberry yield in Field 31 (see Fig. 1) sampled with (a) 148 wide spaced points and (b) for 723 wide and close sampled points combined.

View larger version (19K): [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Structure functions (q) of cranberry yield at small, medium (all fields combined), and large scales.

View larger version (25K): [in a new window]   Fig. 8. Structure functions (q) for the medium scale variability: (a) fields with short range (Srt_Rng) semivariograms combined, (b) fields with long range (Lng_Rng) semivariograms combined.