HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sedman, J. N. Articles by Koch, D. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sedman, J. N. Articles by Koch, D. W. Agricola Articles by Sedman, J. N. Articles by Koch, D. W. Related Collections Forage Management Economics Best Management Practices Alfalfa Production Agriculture

Economic Analysis

An Economic Analysis of Alfalfa Harvest Methods When Infested with Verticillium Wilt

^a formerly Dep. of Agricultural and Applied Economics (currently Sedman Economics, Huntley, WY)
^b Dep. of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071
^c Dep. of Plant Sciences, Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071

^* Corresponding author (bastian{at}uwyo.edu)

Verticillium wilt is a disease that negatively affects alfalfa fields throughout the northern United States. This disease is caused by the fungus Verticillium albo-atrum that, once introduced into alfalfa fields, spreads rapidly, becomes difficult to control, and causes substantial plant yield loss. This disease can be extremely costly for alfalfa hay producers, especially for producers where cool temperatures and relatively humid conditions exist. Little research has been conducted regarding the most economically viable management practices associated with infestation of this disease. This article analyzes the economic returns associated with different harvest practices (two cuttings, two cuttings plus fall grazing, three cuttings, and three cuttings plus fall grazing) given the presence of the disease within a stand. This study utilizes yield data from a study performed by the University of Wyoming Plant Sciences Department. Returns are evaluated using a net present value analysis. Results indicate the most economically viable practice is the two cuttings plus fall grazing.