HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Khurana, H. S. Articles by Peng, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Khurana, H. S. Articles by Peng, S. Agricola Articles by Khurana, H. S. Articles by Peng, S. Related Collections Soil Fertility and Productivity Crop Rotation Systems Rice Crop Models Nutrient Management Production Agriculture Site-Specific Analysis

Site-Specific Analysis & Management

Performance of Site-Specific Nutrient Management for Irrigated, Transplanted Rice in Northwest India

^a Virginia Tech, Dep. of Crop & Soil Environ. Sci., Blacksburg, VA 24061
^b Int. Plant. Nutr. Inst., Southeast Region, Melfa, VA 23410
^c Dep. of Soils, Punjab Agric. Univ., Ludhiana 141004, India
^d Int. Rice Res. Inst. (IRRI), DAPO Box 7777, Manila 1271, the Philippines

^* Corresponding author (hsk{at}vt.edu)

Like in other parts of Asia, irrigated, transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.) yield increases in Punjab, India, have slowed down in recent years. Further yield increases are likely to occur in smaller increments through fine-tuning of crop management mainly by accounting for the large spatial and temporal variation in soil characteristics. On-farm experiments were conducted from 2002 to 2004 at 56 sites in six key irrigated rice-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) domains of Punjab to evaluate an approach for site-specific nutrient management (SSNM). Field-specific N–P–K applications were calculated by accounting for the indigenous nutrient supply, yield targets, and nutrient demand as a function of the interactions between N, P, and K. The performance of SSNM was tested for two rice crops. Compared with the current farmers' fertilizer practice (FFP), average grain yield increased from 5.1 to 6.0 Mg ha^–1, while plant N, P, and K accumulations increased by 13 to 15%. The gross return above fertilizer cost (GRF) was about 14% greater with SSNM than with FFP. Improved timing and/or splitting of fertilizer N increased N recovery efficiency from 0.20 kg kg^–1 in FFP plots to 0.30 kg kg^–1 in SSNM plots. The agronomic N use efficiency was 83% greater with SSNM than with FFP. The year-wise effect on all parameters was, however, nonsignificant. As defined in our study, SSNM has potential for improving yields and nutrient efficiency in irrigated, transplanted rice.

Abbreviations: AE_N, agronomic efficiency of applied fertilizer nitrogen • DAT, days after transplanting • FFP, farmers' fertilizer practice • FK, Faridkot • FP, Firozpur • GD, Gurdaspur • GRF, gross return above fertilizer cost • HO, Hoshiarpur • IKS, indigenous potassium supply • INS, indigenous nitrogen supply • IPS, indigenous phosphorus supply • LU, Ludhiana • PFP_N, partial factor productivity of applied nitrogen • PT, Patiala • QUEFTS, Quantitative Evaluation of the Fertility of Tropical Soils (model) • RE_N, recovery efficiency of applied nitrogen • SSNM, site-specific nutrient management