HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Heckman, J. R. Articles by Reid, W. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Heckman, J. R. Articles by Reid, W. S. Agricola Articles by Heckman, J. R. Articles by Reid, W. S. Related Collections Phosphorus Nutrient Management Soil Fertility and Productivity Maize Management

Corn

Soil Test Calibration for Predicting Corn Response to Phosphorus in the Northeast USA

^a Dep. of Plant Biology and Pathology, 59 Dudley Road-Foran Hall, Cook College, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8520
^b Plant and Soil Science Dep., 215 Hills Agric. Science, Univ. of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405
^c Dep. of Plant Science, U-67, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-4067
^d Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, 410 Agricultural Science and Industries Building, Penn State Univ., University Park, PA 16802
^e Agriculture and Natural Resources Dep., 163 Townsend Hall, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716
^f Dep. of Natural Resource Sciences and Landscape Architecture, 214 H.J. Patterson Hall, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
^g Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences, Bowditch Hall 207, Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003-0910
^h USDA-ARS, NEPSWL, Room 23, Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04469
ⁱ Plant, Soil and Environmental Sciences, Room 409A, 5722 Deering Hall, Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5722
^j Univ. of Maine CE, 495 College Ave., Orono, ME 04473-1294
^k CELS-PLS, 214 Woodward Hall, Univ. of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881
^l Division of Plant and Soil Sciences, West Virginia Univ., P.O. Box 6108, Morgantown, WV 26506-6108
^m Plant Biology Dep., Spaulding Hall, Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824
ⁿ Crop and Soil Sciences, 1004 Bradfield Hall, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853

^* Corresponding author (heckman{at}aesop.rutgers.edu)

Received for publication April 26, 2005. The consensus of soil fertility specialists working in the northeast USA was that soil testing and recommendation systems for P needed to be reexamined because of recent changes in soil testing methodology in the laboratory and corn (Zea mays L.) production technology in the field. Soil tests (M-COL, MM-COL, B-ICP, M1-ICP, and M3-ICP) were performed by either colorimetry or inductively coupled plasma (ICP) emission spectroscopy on samples from soil test calibration studies conducted during 1998 to 1999 at 51 experimental sites chosen to represent a range of soils, including Ultisols, Spodosols, and Alfisols, in northeastern states (Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and West Virginia). The mean P measured by M-COL, MM-COL, B-ICP, M1-ICP, and M3-ICP was 8.3, 6.6, 148, 66, and 121 mg P kg^–1, respectively. Production practices followed local state extension recommendations at each site and included P fertilizer treatments: none, 15 kg P ha^–1 banded, or 60 kg P ha^–1 broadcast. Combined analysis of variance over sites showed that plant height at 35 d after planting, silk emergence, grain yield, and grain dry down were enhanced by the broadcast P treatment. There were yield increases (P < 0.10) to the band treatment at only four sites and to the broadcast treatment at nine sites. Cate-Nelson statistical analysis of relative yield in relation to soil test P failed to identify soil test P critical levels for any of the soil test methods. The percentage of experimental sites that had soil test P levels below the currently used critical levels in the region ranged from 14 to 65% of the sites. Results showed that 17 to 47% of those sites testing below the critical level exhibited a yield increase (P < 0.10) to broadcast P. Some of the yield responsive sites had soil test P above currently used critical levels. The calibration data obtained from the present study and the relationships examined between soil test P and relative yield do not necessarily validate the currently used soil test P critical levels nor does the data enable much refinement. This study shows that the current critical levels frequently permit both types of errors in soil test prediction; indicating a need for P fertilization when it may not be needed and not indicating a need for P fertilization when it may be needed. The second type of error is usually avoided by recommendations for crop removal rates of P.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Ziadi, G. Belanger, A. N. Cambouris, N. Tremblay, M. C. Nolin, and A. Claessens Relationship between P and N Concentrations in Corn Agron. J., May 11, 2007; 99(3): 833 - 841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]