Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 1998
Published in Agron J 90:389-392 (1998)
© 1998 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Acock, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Acock, M. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Acock, M. C.

Testing for Early Photoperiod Insensitivity in Soybean

Zhongchun Wang*, Vangimalla R. Reddy and Mary C. Acock

USDA-ARS, Remote Sensing and Modeling Laboratory, BARC West, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350

* Corresponding author (zwang{at}asrr.arsusda.gov)

To accurately model the flowering process in soybean, it is essential to identify photoperiod-sensitive and photoperiod-insensitive phases of development. Despite extensive studies, there remains some disagreement about when soybean plants first become sensitive to photoperiod. The length of the juvenile phase from emergence has been found to differ for the same cultivar. This experiment tested the hypothesis that the early phase in soybean development is truly photoperiod-independent. Soybean plants [Glycine max (L.) Merr. cv. Hutcheson; Maturity Group V] grown in controlled environments at a constant air temperature of 26°C were transferred from a noninductive 22-h photoperiod to an inductive 8-, 10-, 12-, or 14-h photoperiod at 2- to 5-d intervals after seedling emergence (defined as the day when the cotyledons appeared above the soil surface). The duration of the so-called juvenile phase was shown to be photoperiod-dependent, the photoperiod effect being nonlinear. Soybean plants became sensitive to an 8-, 10-, 12-, and 14-h photoperiod at -1, 0, 1, and 9 d after seedling emergence, respectively. Based on these and other results, we conclude that there is no juvenile phase in Hutcheson soybean, and that photoperiod sensitivity begins when seedlings are exposed to light, bat the rate of progress towards flowering depends on the photoperiod experience

Received for publication August 11, 1997.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Agronomy.