HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Allen, L. H. Articles by Jones, P. H. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Allen, L. H., Jr. Articles by Jones, P. H. Agricola Articles by Allen, L. H. Articles by Jones, P. H.

Soybean Leaf Water Potential Responses to Carbon Dioxide and Drought

USDA-ARS, Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0965
Botany Div., Ctr. de Pesquisas do Cacau, Div. de Botanica, Caixa Postal, 7, Itabuna, Bahia, Brazil

James W. Jones and Pierce H. Jones

Dep. of Agric. Engineering, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0570

^* Corresponding author (lhajr{at}nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu)

Rising CO₂ can have direct effects on crop water relations and indirect effects on water available for growth. We studied the effects of elevated CO₂ and drought on leaf water relations of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. cv. Bragg] and considered the hypothesis of osmotic adjustment mediated by increased photosynthesis (Hypothesis 1) vs. the hypothesis of water conservation mediated by decreased stomatal conductance (Hypothesis 2) to explain improved water relations of plants growing under elevated CO₂. In Exp. 1, soybean was grown at 330, 450, 660, and 800 µmol mol^–1 CO₂ in sunlit, closed-circulation, controlled-environment chambers under well-watered conditions. Leaf total water potential (WP), osmotic potential (OP), and turgor potential (TP) were measured at midday during V4 to R6 stages of development. In Exp. 2 (well-watered, R1-R3) and Exp. 3 (13-d drying cycle, R6 seed filling), soybean was grown at 330 and 660 µmol mol^–1 CO₂, and WP,OP, and TP were measured five times per day on sunlit and shaded leaves. In Exp. 3, stomatal conductance (g_s) and transpiration rate (TR) of leaves were also measured. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that elevated CO₂ increased TP and decreased OP, but did not affect leaf WP, thus favoring Hypothesis 1. In Exp. 3, leaf WP was higher in elevated than ambient CO₂. Diurnal TP was higher in elevated than ambient CO₂ at the beginning of drought, and was maintained longer each day as drought progressed. At the end of drought, TP and WP was higher in elevated than ambient CO₂. Elevated CO₂ leaves had lower TR because of lower g_s than ambient CO₂ counterparts. Thus, Exp. 3 supported Hypothesis 2, that both stressed and nonstressed plants in elevated CO₂ have a better water status (e.g., higher TP) than plants in ambient CO₂ due to water conservation mediated by decreased g_s. Remobilization of leaf nutrients during seed filling may limit the capability for osmotic adjustment. Regardless of the mechanisms, growth of plants in elevated CO₂ should be less affected by drought than plants in ambient CO₂.

Received for publication May 12, 1997.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. W. Wall, R. L. Garcia, B. A. Kimball, D. J. Hunsaker, P. J. Pinter Jr., S. P. Long, C. P. Osborne, D. L. Hendrix, F. Wechsung, G. Wechsung, et al. Interactive Effects of Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Drought on Wheat Agron. J., March 2, 2006; 98(2): 354 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. W. Polley Implications of Atmospheric and Climatic Change for Crop Yield and Water Use Efficiency Crop Sci., January 1, 2002; 42(1): 131 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.E. Specht, D.J. Hume, and S.V. Kumudini Soybean Yield Potential--A Genetic and Physiological Perspective Crop Sci., November 1, 1999; 39(6): 1560 - 1570. [Abstract] [Full Text]