Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1997
Published in Agron J 89:981-987 (1997)
© 1997 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Prine, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Prine, G. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Prine, G. M.

Establishment of Rhizoma Peanut: Interaction of Cultivar, Planting Date, and Location on Emergence and Rate of Cover

M. J. Williams*, C. A. Kelly-Begazo and R. L. Stanley, Jr.

USDA-ARS, Subtropical Agric. Res. Stn., Brooksville, FL 34601-4672
Int. Prog., Univ. of Florida, IFAS, Gainesville, FL 32611
Univ. of Florida, North Florida REC, Quincy FL 32351

K. H. Quesenberry and G. M. Prine

Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Florida, IFAS, Gainesville, FL 32611

* Corresponding author (mjwi{at}icon.bkv.ufl.edu).

Rhizoma perennial peanut (RPP), Arachis glabrata Benth., has high nutritive value, drought tolerance, and persistence; however, inconsistent establishment success and slow rate of coverage has limited the use of RPP in production systems. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of planting date (February, April, June, August, and December), location (Brooksville, Gainesville, and Quincy, FL), and cultivar (Florigraze and Arbrook) on emergence (sprouts per square meter at 2 to 12 wk post planting) and rate of RPP cover (percent ground cover at 26, 52, 78, and 104 wk post planting). We also determined the relationship of sprout counts during the emergence period with rate of cover. Number of sprouts per square meter at 12 wk post planting ranged from 0 to >200 and, in most cases, the sprout counts obtained for April, June, August, and December planting dates were lower or equal to those from the February planting date, regardless of location or cultivar. Generally, Arbrook had higher numbers of sprouts per square meter at 12 wk post planting than Florigraze, but this did not translate into higher ground cover ratings at 26 wk. Number of sprouts per square meter was positively correlated with percent ground cover. The highest correlation coefficient (0.69) occurred for the relationship of sprouts per square meter at 12 wk post planting and ground cover at 26 wk post planting; correlations of responses declined from that point as stands aged. Rate of cover was also variable, taking between 26 and >104 wk post planting to reach >60% RPP ground cover. On average, February plantings achieved >60% RPP ground cover 26 wk earlier than any of the other planting dates. This study indicates that establishment times for RPP can be more variable than has been thought. The first criterion for deciding when to plant is the need for reliable soil moisture (from rainfall or irrigation) for 60 to 90 d post planting. Secondly, if there is more than one time of the year that meets this moisture requirement, then the planting date with the longest frostfree period after planting should be chosen.


Joint contribution of the USDA-ARS and the Florida Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal Series no. R-05751.

Received for publication September 8, 1996.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. J. Williams, T. R. Sinclair, P. Mislevy, K. H. Quesenberry, A. S. Blount, and S. W. Coleman
Photoperiod Sensitivity of Rhizoma Peanut Germplasm
Agron. J., August 11, 2008; 100(5): 1366 - 1370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
T. J. Butler, J. P. Muir, M. A. Islam, and J. R. Bow
Rhizoma Peanut Yield and Nutritive Value are Influenced by Harvest Technique and Timing
Agron. J., October 15, 2007; 99(6): 1559 - 1563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
T. J. Butler, W. R. Ocumpaugh, M. A. Sanderson, R. L. Reed, and J. P. Muir
Evaluation of Rhizoma Peanut Genotypes for Adaptation in Texas
Agron. J., October 31, 2006; 98(6): 1589 - 1593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. J. Williams, C. C. Chase Jr., and A. C. Hammond
Performance of Cows and Their Calves Creep-Grazed on Rhizoma Perennial Peanut
Agron. J., May 1, 2004; 96(3): 671 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. J. Williams, E. Valencia, and L. E. Sollenberger
No-Till Establishment of Rhizoma Peanut
Agron. J., November 1, 2002; 94(6): 1350 - 1354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. D. Redfearn, B. C. Venuto, and W.D. Pitman
Nutritive Value Responses of Rhizoma Peanut to Nitrogen and Harvest Frequency
Agron. J., January 1, 2001; 93(1): 107 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society of Agronomy.