HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Légère, A. Articles by Simard, R. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Légère, A. Articles by Simard, R. R. Agricola Articles by Légère, A. Articles by Simard, R. R.

Response of Spring Barley to Crop Rotation, Conservation Tillage, and Weed Management Intensity

Sainte-Foy and Saskatoon Research Centres, Centres, AAFC, 107 Science Dr., Saskatoon SK, Canada, S7N 0K2;
226 Chemin des Granites, Lac Beauport QC, Canada, G0A 2C0;
Ferme de recherches sur le mouto, AAAC, 1642, 2e Rang ouest, C.P. 400, La Pocatiére QC, Canada, G0R 1Z0;

Denis A. Angers and Regis R. Simard

Centre de recherche et de développement sur les sols et les grandes cultures, AAAC, 2560, boul. Hochelaga, Sainte-Foy QC, Canada, G1V 2J3.

^* Corresponding author (legerea{at}em.agr.ca).

Constraints to the adoption of conservation tillage in central and eastern Quebec potentially include cool wet springs, short growing seasons, and variable precipitation patterns. This study was conducted to determine the suitability of conservation tillage practices to cereal cropping systems in this area of Quebec. The effects of crop rotation [spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) monoculture; spring barley-red clover (Trifollum pratense L.) rotationl, tillage [fall moldboard plow (MP); fall chisel plow (CP), and direct-seeded no-till (NT)], and management intensity (intensive, moderate, minimum) on populations and dry weights of crop and weeds at midseason, and on wain yields and yield components were examined on a Kamouraska clay and a Saint-André gravelly-sandy loam. On the clay site, moderate weed management in NT treatments resulted in crop establishment, growth, and yields comparable to those in MP treatments. Over five years, wain yields in NT treatments averaged 2877 kg ha^–1, compared with 2870 and 2260 kg ha^–1 in MP and CP, respectively. Grain yields were also consistently but not statistically higher in the rotation (3014 kg ha^–1) than in the monoculture (2322 kg ha^–1). On the loam site, crop establishment, growth, and yields responded negatively to reductions in tillage and weed management intensity. Barley stand establishment and weed control in CP and NT treatments on the loam site were less successful in the monoculture than in the rotation. No-till grain yields (1494 kg ha^–1) were on average 7% lower than CP yields 1608 kg ha^–1), and 29% lower than MP yields (2076 kg ha^–1). Rotation had no effect on wain yields on the loam site. Findings confirm the potential of conservation tillage to generate sustained yield returns in spring barley cropping systems, provided that proper attention is given to critical aspects of the cropping system, including crop establishment and weed management.

Received for publication July 1, 1996.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Dhima, I. Vasilakoglou, A. Lithourgidis, S. Papadopoulou, and I. Eleftherohorinos Tillage System Effects on Competition between Barley and Sterile Oat Agron. J., June 5, 2006; 98(4): 1023 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]