HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by d'Andria, R. Articles by Mori, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by d'Andria, R. Articles by Mori, M. Agricola Articles by d'Andria, R. Articles by Mori, M.

Grain Yield and Water Consumption of Ethephon-Treated Corn under Different Irrigation Regimes

CNR Irrigation Institute, P.O. Box 101, 80040 San Sebastiano al Vesuvio, Naples, Italy
Dep. of Plant Production, Univ. of Basilicata, 85 via N. Sauro, 85100 Potenza, Italy
CNR Irrigation Institute, P.O. Box 101, 80040 San Sebastiano al Vesuvio, Naples, Italy
Dep. of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Univ. of Naples, 80055 Portici, Naples, Italy

^* Corresponding author (dandria{at}statO.ispaim.na.cnr.it).

Ethephon (2-chloroethyl phosphonic acid) has been widely studied under field conditions as a growth regulator to enhance yield in corn (Zea mays L.) by controlling lodging. However, few studies have examined the interaction between ethephon and soil water availability on grain yield and growth patterns of corn. The objective of this research was to study the effects of ethephon rates and timing of applications in combination with different irrigation levels on water use, yield and its attributes, total dry matter accumulation, LAI, and plant height. The 2-yr study (1993–1994) was carried out at the CNR Irrigation Institute experimental farm in southern Italy (14°50' E, 40°07' N; sandy-clay soil) using corn (cv. Aida, FAO class 500). Treatments consisted of four irrigation regimes and four and six ethephon treatments for 1993 and 1994, respectively, in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. Irrigation regimes were a rainfed control (T₀) and three treatments replenishing the soil water profile to field capacity to a depth of 0.7 m at different frequencies: T_w, weekly irrigation; T₂, irrigation at two growth stages (VT and Rl); and T₄, irrigation at four stages (V7, VT, Rl, and R4). Ethephon was applied both years at the V5 stage at rates of 280, 560, and 840 g a.i. ha^–1. In 1994, two additional treatments were included by applying, at the V9 stage, an additional 280 g ha^–1 of ethephon to treatments that had previously received 280 or 560 g a.i. ha^–1. Increasing ethephon rates caused a significant reduction in LAI, plant height, and dry matter accumulation, resulting in a reduction in water consumption. In the rainfed control, increasing the ethephon rate resulted in a linear increase in yield, with maximum increase of about 200% (1.6 t ha^–1) and 75% (1.7 t ha^–1) in 1993 and 1994, respectively. By contrast, treatments irrigated four times showed a linear decrease of about 13% in both years. Ethephon treatment had no effect on grain yield in the T_w and T₂ treatments. Kernel number was the yield component with the greatest influence on grain production. Our results suggest that ethephon may increase grain yield when natural or artificial water supply is a limiting factor.

Received for publication December 28, 1995.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. C. Nielsen, M. F. Vigil, and J. G. Benjamin Forage Yield Response to Water Use for Dryland Corn, Millet, and Triticale in the Central Great Plains Agron. J., June 5, 2006; 98(4): 992 - 998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]