Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1995
Published in Agron J 87:1154-1156 (1995)
© 1995 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krall, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Legg, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Krall, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Legg, D. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Krall, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Legg, D. E.

Influence of Alfalfa Escapes on Estimating Spring Barley Yield

James M. Krall*, Stephen D. Miller and David E. Legg

Dep. of Plant, Soil and Insect Sci., Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071

* Corresponding author(Email: jkrall{at}uwyo.edu).

In Wyoming, spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) can follow alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in irrigated rotations. To avoid serious wind erosion, this conversion should be done using conservation tillage. However, this can be complicated by alfalfa escapes. The relationship between the level of established alfalfa interference and barley is unknown. Establishment of the season-long impact of alfalfa escapes on barley yield would be important for crop-loss assessment. Forecasting the impact on production would be valuable as a decision making tool. The objective of this study was to estimate yield losses from season-long interference of alfalfa escapes and to forecast impact of alfalfa escapes on spring barley yield. Replicated field studies were conducted under sprinkler irrigation at a site near Torrington, WY. Herbicide treatments were used to provide for barley production across a range of levels of alfalfa interference. Barley yield response was regressed on various measures of alfalfa infestation. Consistency of regression over years for barley yield on end-of-season alfalfa stand or alfalfa yield allowed for simple interpretation of the expected barley yield reduction, as well as calculation of the expected barley yield given a specific level of alfalfa infestation. Use of a growing season visual assessment of alfalfa control did not result in consistency of regression slopes over years. Calculation of an expected barley yield based on models developed using alfalfa stand and alfalfa yield was accomplished. The predictors are –84.747 and –0.5577 for alfalfa plants 0.5 m–2 and kg ha–1 alfalfa yield, respectively.


Wyoming Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal Series JA 1725.

Received for publication September 20, 1994.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Agronomy.