HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Reeves, D. W. Articles by Mullins, G. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Reeves, D. W. Articles by Mullins, G. L. Agricola Articles by Reeves, D. W. Articles by Mullins, G. L.

Subsoiling and Potassium Placement Effects on Water Relations and Yield of Cotton

USDA-ARS Natl. Soil Dynamics Lab., P.O. Box 3439, Auburn, AL 36831-3439
Dep. of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn Univ., Auburn University, AL 36849-5412.

^* Corresponding author (Email: wreeves{at}ag.auburn.edu).

Deep placement of K fertilizer may alleviate late-season K deficiency of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) on soils adequate in surface soil K but low in subsoil K. This 2-yr study in Alabama evaluated effects of deep tillage (in-row subsoiling) and K fertilizer placement on yield, leaf K deficiency, soil water depletion, and stomatal conductance of cotton grown on a soil with a root-restricting hardpan. The Norfolk sandy loam (fine-loamy, siliceous, thermic Typic Kandiudults) soil tested medium for K in the top 15 cm and low at greater depths. Treatments were: (i) no K, no subsoiling; (ii) no K, subsoiled; (iii) surface application (84 kg K ha^–1), no subsoiling; (iv) surface application, subsoiled; and (v) deep placement in the subsoiled channel. Surface application without subsoiling resulted in the greatest soil water content (0- to 80-cm depth); deep placement, the lowest. Stomatal conductance was highest with no-K, no subsoiling and lowest with K (surface or deep), subsoiled. There was no evidence of K or drought stress-induced stomatal closure, and stomatal closure was not related to severity of leaf K deficiency. All three K treatments increased leaf K concentration at early bloom. Subsoiling without K fertilizer increased plant size and severity of leaf K deficiency; with surface K, subsoiling more than doubled total leaf area but did not affect leaf K deficiency. Within subsoiled treatments, leaf K deficiency was more severe with deep placement of K than with surface application. Subsoiling, especially with K fertilizer, maximized seed cotton yield in both years (avg. 3261 kg ha^–1) but reduced stomatal conductance. Stomatal closure and premature leaf senescence are not the likely mechanism for late-season leaf K-deficiency in cotton. Although subsoiling was necessary to maximize cotton yields on this Coastal Plain soil with a root-restricting hardpan, deep placement of K fertilizer was not superior to surface application.

Received for publication July 5, 1994.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Siri-Prieto, D. W. Reeves, and R. L. Raper Tillage Requirements for Integrating Winter-Annual Grazing in Cotton Production: Plant Water Status and Productivity Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2007; 71(1): 197 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. H. Schomberg, R. G. McDaniel, E. Mallard, D. M. Endale, D. S. Fisher, and M. L. Cabrera Conservation Tillage and Cover Crop Influences on Cotton Production on a Southeastern U.S. Coastal Plain Soil Agron. J., August 3, 2006; 98(5): 1247 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. S. Balkcom, D. W. Reeves, J. N. Shaw, C. H. Burmester, and L. M. Curtis Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality from Irrigated Tillage Systems in the Tennessee Valley Agron. J., April 11, 2006; 98(3): 596 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. B. Schwab, D. W. Reeves, C. H. Burmester, and R. L. Raper Conservation Tillage Systems for Cotton in the Tennessee Valley Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2002; 66(2): 569 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]