Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 1995
Published in Agron J 87:538-546 (1995)
© 1995 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liebman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Halteman, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Liebman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Halteman, W. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Liebman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Halteman, W. A.

Dry Bean Responses to Nitrogen Fertilizer in Two Tillage and Residue Management Systems

Matt Liebman* and Sue Corson

Sustainable Agric. Program, 5722 Deering Hall, Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5722

Richard J. Rowe and William A. Halteman

Dep. of Bio-Resource Engineering
Dep. of Mathematics and Statistics

* Corresponding author.

Few data currently exist concerning dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production systems in which minimum tillage techniques and cover crops are integrated with reduced reliance on chemical inputs. For this reason, we conducted a 2-yr field experiment in central Maine to compare bean growth, N status, and seed yield in two tillage and residue management systems: conventional planting into a tilled seedbed and two herbicide applications vs. no-tillage planting into a rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop and a single herbicide application. Nitrogen fertilizer was applied at 0, 45, 90, and 135 kg N ha–1 to both systems. In 1990, a year characterized by wet early-season conditions, bean seed yield was 26% lower in the no-tillage-rye mulch system than the conventional system, and increased linearly with N fertilizer rate in both systems. In contrast, in 1991, when early-season rainfall was near normal, yield of the no-tillage-rye mulch system was 23% lower than that of the conventional system without N fertilizer, but increased quadratically to equal yield of the conventional system when N was applied. In both years, seed yield was significantly correlated with early and midseason leaf N concentration and late-season leaf area index. Weed growth was greater in the no-tillage-rye mulch system than the conventional system in 1990, but equally low in both systems in 1991, when an additional cultivation was performed. Because the no-tillage-rye mulch system we examined may reduce bean growth, N status, and yield, we recommend that other management strategies be pursued. Use of legume green manures as N sources in temperate bean production systems merits attention.


Contribution 1847 of the Maine Agric. and Forest Exp. Stn.

Received for publication June 11, 1994.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
F. Aleman
Common Bean Response to Tillage Intensity and Weed Control Strategies
Agron. J., May 1, 2001; 93(3): 556 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Agronomy.