Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 1995
Published in Agron J 87:420-424 (1995)
© 1995 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cochran, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Schlentner, S. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cochran, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Schlentner, S. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cochran, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Schlentner, S. F.

Intercropped Oat and Fababean in Alaska: Dry Matter Production, Dinitrogen Fixation, Nitrogen Transfer, and Nitrogen Fertilizer Response

Verlan L. Cochran* and Sharon F. Schlentner

USDA-ARS, Northern Plains Soil & Water Res. Ctr., P.O. Box 1109, Sidney, MT 59270
USDA-ARS, 309 O'Neill Bldg., Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, P.O. Box 757200, Fairbanks, AK 99775-720

* Corresponding author (Email: !a031csidney@attmail.com).

There are conflicting reports on the amount of N transferred from legumes to intercropped nonlegumes and on the need for N fertilizer to obtain high total dry matter yields on soil with low N availability. This study evaluates (i) the ability of fababean (Vicia faba L.) to meet its N requirements from biological N2 fixation: (ii) the amount of N transferred to intercropped oat (Avena sativa L.); and (iii) N fertilizer management to maximize dry matter production and N2 fixation in a cold soil. A randomized complete block experimental design with four replications was used with two rows of fababean alternating with two rows of oat. Urea was applied in bands between fababean or oat rows at 90 kg N ha–1 to get the following treatments: (i) oat with added N (+N), fababean +N, inoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum by. viceae (+I); (ii) oat +N, fababean without added N, inoculated (–N, +I); (iii) oat –N, fababean –N,+I; (iv) oat –N, fababean +N,–I; and (v) oat –N, fababean –N, + I. A second study compared uptake of 15N-depleted fertilizer by oat and fababean, where the fertilizer was broadcast over the plot or band-applied between rows of oat and fababean planted in alternate rows. Less than 1% of the uninoculated fababean plants nodulated in either experiment; thus, they were a good check for estimating N2 fixation using the difference method. Nitrogen fertilizer increased dry matter production of fababean in some years, but did not increase N uptake. There was little evidence of N transfer from fababean to oat. Oat depended on N fertilizer for maximum dry matter production 3 of the 4 yr. Maximum total dry matter production was achieved by fertilizing the oat and not the fababean in 3 of the 4 yr. The amount of N2 fixed by fababean averaged 50 kg N ha–1. Fababean plants obtained >50% of their N from broadcast urea, but < 10% when urea was banded between oat and fababean rows. Configuring a commercial drill to band fertilizer between pairs of oat rows alternating with fababean is a practical way to maximize both N2 fixation and total dry matter production.

Received for publication March 31, 1994.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Agronomy.