Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 March 1995
Published in Agron J 87:208-213 (1995)
© 1995 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raun, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Barreto, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Raun, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Barreto, H. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Raun, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Barreto, H. J.

Regional Maize Grain Yield Response to Applied Phosphorus in Central America

William R. Raun* and Hector J. Barreto

Dep. of Agronomy, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
CIMMYT, Apdo. Postal 6-641, Mexico D.F. 06600, Mexico

* Corresponding author.

Maize (Zea mays L.) in Central America is commonly grown under continuous cultivation and on marginal lands where restricted use of conservation practices and fertilizers limit productivity. Maize grain yield response to P source, rate, and method of application was evaluated at 33 locations in Central America. Soil orders included Andisols, Inceptisols, and Ultisols. Treatments included rock phosphate (RP) applied broadcast preplant without incorporation at rates of 13 and 26 kg P ha–1, triple superphosphate (TSP) band-applied at planting at rates of 13 and 26 kg P ha–1, TSP broadcast preplant at 26 kg P ha–1, and a check where no P was applied. All treatments received 100 kg of N ha–1 as urea applied in split applications and 30 kg S ha–1 as CaSO4.2H2O. Averaged over locations, maize grain yield increased 0.38 and 0.74 Mg ha–1 when 13 and 26 kg P ha–1 was band-applied as TSP and increased 0.21 and 0.16 Mg ha–1 when RP was broadcast at the same rates. All P treatments had a probability (PR) >0.61 of outperforming the unfertilized check. Triple superphosphate band-applied at 26 kg P ha–1 offered the greatest probability (0.69) of an economicr esponse to P fertilizer across environments. Stability analyses and analyses of yield differences suggest that response to applied P was independent of environment for the sites evaluated. The consistent response to applied P across a wide range of environments demonstrates that P is a limiting element for maize production on marginal lands in Central America and that the probability for economic response to applied P is high.


Contribution from the Int, Maize and Wheat Improvement Ctr. (CIMMYT).

Received for publication February 12, 1994.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Agronomy.