|
|
||||||||
USDA-ARS Remote Sensing Research Lab, Bldg. 007 BARC-West, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, MD 20705-2350
NASA Goddard Space Flight Ctr., Greenbelt, MD 20771
Dep. of Geography, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
NASA Goddard Space Flight Ctr., Greenbelt, MD 20771
U.S. Army Engineer Topographic Labs, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060
* Corresponding author (Email: cdaughtry{at}asrr.arsusda.gov).
Crop residues left in the field after harvest can be important in controlling soil erosion. Current methods for quantifying percent crop residue cover are tedious and somewhat subjective. There is a need for new methods to quantify residue cover that are rapid, accurate, and objective. We evaluated reflectance and fluorescence techniques for discriminating crop residues from a wide range of soils. Reflectance and fluorescence spectra of 37 agricultural soils (wet and dry) and of recently harvested and weathered corn (Zea mays L.), soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moenchl, and wheat (Triticum aestivutn L.) residues were measured in the lab. Reflectance factors in the visible or near-infrared wavelengths did not uniquely distinguish all soils from all crop residues. Crop residues may be brighter or darker than a given soil, depending on soil moisture and residue age. When illuminated with ultraviolet radiation, however, the crop residues fluoresced more than most of the soils. Fluorescence of crop residues was a broad-band phenomenon centered between 420 to 520 nm and induced by a relatively broad range of excitation wavelengths centered betweert 350 to 400 nm. More than 90% of the crop residues <2 yr old could be discriminated from 33 of 37 dry soils and 36 of 37 wet soils using fluorescence. The threshold for discrimination can be optimized for classification accuracy for each soil. Fluorescence techniques are less ambiguous than reflectance methods and are better suited for discriminating crop residues on soils. Furthermore, if properly implemented, fluorescence techniques can be used to quantify crop residue cover in the field.
Received for publication February 12, 1994.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D.G. Sullivan, T.C. Strickland, and M.H. Masters Satellite mapping of conservation tillage adoption in the Little River experimental watershed, Georgia Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, May 1, 2008; 63(3): 112 - 119. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.G. Sullivan, D. Lee, J. Beasley, S. Brown, and E.J. Williams Evaluating a crop residue cover index for determining tillage regime in a cotton-corn-peanut rotation Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, January 1, 2008; 63(1): 28 - 36. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.G. Sullivan, J.N. Shaw, A. Price, and E. van Santen Spectral Reflectance Properties of Winter Cover Crops in the Southeastern Coastal Plain Agron. J., November 6, 2007; 99(6): 1587 - 1596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Sullivan, C. C. Truman, H. H. Schomberg, D. M. Endale, and T. C. Strickland Evaluating Techniques for Determining Tillage Regime in the Southeastern Coastal Plain and Piedmont Agron. J., August 3, 2006; 98(5): 1236 - 1246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Sullivan, J. N. Shaw, P. L. Mask, D. Rickman, E. A. Guertal, J. Luvall, and J. M. Wersinger Evaluation of Multispectral Data for Rapid Assessment of Wheat Straw Residue Cover Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2004; 68(6): 2007 - 2013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S.T. Daughtry Discriminating Crop Residues from Soil by Shortwave Infrared Reflectance Agron. J., January 1, 2001; 93(1): 125 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||