HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Clark, K. M. Articles by Myers, R. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Clark, K. M. Articles by Myers, R. L. Agricola Articles by Clark, K. M. Articles by Myers, R. L.

Intercrop Performance of Pearl Millet, Amaranth, Cowpea, Soybean, and Guar in Response to Planting Pattern and Nitrogen Fertilization

Dep. of Agronomy, 210 Waters Hall, Univ. of Missouri, Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211

^* Corresponding author. (Email: agrokc{at}mizzoul.edu).

Intercropping is a common practice in developing countries because it may produce higher total yields than monocropping. The objective of this study was to apply intercropping principles to alternative and traditional crops in the USA under mechanized conditions. Although these crops have been examined in intercropping systems, in most cases studies were not conducted with improved varieties found in the USA or in strip widths that can accommodate machinery. A Held study was conducted at two central Missouri locations in 1991 and 1992 to determine the effect of intercropping on grain yields of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.], amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus L. x A. hybridus L.), cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.], guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.], and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Treatments were assigned in an incomplete factorial design and consisted of planting pattern (monocrops, narrow and wide row strips, and alternate row intercrops), N fertilizer (0, 56, or 112 kg N ha^–1), and component crop combination. Each intercrop consisted of a legume (cowpea, soybean, or guar) and a nonlegume (pearl millet or amaranth). In the strip intercrops, only cowpea showed a consistent yield response to planting pattern, with the narrow strip arrangement with amaranth yielding 53 and 39% lower than its monocrop in two environments. Land equivalent ratios of amaranth and pearl millet grown in alternate rows with cowpea were not significantly different from their monocrops. At the Columbia site, yields of alternate row intercrops generally did not increase upon addition of N and in 1992, amaranth yield at 0 kg N ha^–1 was 25% higher in the alternate row intercrop than it was at the same N rate in the monocrop. In general, grain yields were similar in the various intercrops compared with monocrops.

Received for publication March 19, 1993.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. C. Rao, S. W. Coleman, and H. S. Mayeux Forage Production and Nutritive Value of Selected Pigeonpea Ecotypes in the Southern Great Plains Crop Sci., July 1, 2002; 42(4): 1259 - 1263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]