Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1994
Published in Agron J 86:1054-1060 (1994)
© 1994 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, C. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, C. H.

Performance of Fall- and Spring-Planted Durum Wheat in Western Colorado

Calvin H. Pearson*

Fruita Res. Ctr., 1910 L Road, Fruita, CO 81521

* Corresponding author (Email: cpearson{at}teal.csn.org).

Several years of fall planting of spring types (non-vernalization requiring) of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L., durum group) in smallgrain cultivar performance tests in western Colorado have resulted in high grain yields with no observed plant stand losses. Comparison studies between fall and spring plantings of durum wheat have not been conducted. Field studies were conducted during 1988, 1989, and 1990 at the Colorado State University Fruita Research Center near Grand Junction to determine plant response of durum wheat cultivars to planting dates, and to study grain yield and yield component relationships of durum wheat cultivars when planted in the fall, early spring, and late spring. Fall-and early spring-plante durum wheat generally had higher grain yields, test weights, kernel mass, and were taller than late springplanted wheat. Fall-planted durum had fewer kernels per spikelet than wheat in spring plantings and a lower seed N concentration than durum in the late spring planting. Kernels per spikelet and kernel mass had the most consistent and highest direct correlations with grain yield. Our findings indicate that the potential exists to increase the productivity and widen the adaptation of durum wheat by identifying favorable temperate locations and using appropriate planting dates. Winter durum (vernalization-requiring) cultivars developed for the USA would be useful in widening the adaptation and increasing the productivity of this class of wheat


Contribution from the Dep. of Agronomy, Colorado Agric. Exp. Stn. Project no. 15-672. Work supported in part by grants from Mesa and Montrose Counties, Colorado

Received for publication March 14, 1994.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. S. Schilling, A. O. Abaye, C. A. Griffey, D. E. Brann, M. M. Alley, and T. H. Pridgen
Adaptation and Performance of Winter Durum Wheat in Virginia
Agron. J., May 1, 2003; 95(3): 642 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Agronomy.