Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1994
Published in Agron J 86:1001-1005 (1994)
© 1994 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stout, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stout, W. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Stout, W. L.

Evaluation of the SPUR Model for Grasslands of the Northeastern United States

William L. Stout*

USDA-ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research, University Park, PA 16802

* Corresponding author (Email: wsl{at}psuvm.psu.edu).

Computer models that simulate grassland production must be valid for the ecosystem in which they are used. Our objective was to develop a grassland production data base and to use the data base to calibrate and validate a grassland production model for the northeastern United States. The SPUR (Simulation of Production and Utilization of Rangeland) model was evaluated for its ability to simulate aboveground biomass production in two physiographic provinces of northeastern USA. The model was calibrated for orchardgrass and switchgrass using one year of plant, soil, and weather data from four study sites. Calibrations mainly involved adjustment of photosynthetic rate, root-to-shoot ratio, temperature for root-to-shoot translocation, and rooting depth. Once calibrated, the model was validated by simulating aboveground biomass production for two ensuing years on the four sites. Two years of simulated biomass for the grasses agreed well with the observed biomass on all four study sites with r2 values of 0.48 for orchardgrass and 0.70 for switchgrass. The largest discrepancies between simulated and observed biomass occurred early in the spring at low levels of N fertilization. In its present form, SPUR can be used to develop production indices for cool- and warm-season grasses on different soils.

Received for publication February 8, 1993.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. H. Skinner, M. S. Corson, and T. G. Gilmanov
Simulating Gross Primary Productivity of Humid-Temperate Pastures
Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 801 - 807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. R. Kiniry, B. L. Burson, G. W. Evers, J. R. Williams, H. Sanchez, C. Wade, J. W. Featherston, and J. Greenwade
Coastal Bermudagrass, Bahiagrass, and Native Range Simulation at Diverse Sites in Texas
Agron. J., February 6, 2007; 99(2): 450 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SIMULATIONHome page
J.W. Skiles and C.H. Schulbach
Rehosting A Mini-Computer Model On A Supercomputer
SIMULATION, January 1, 1996; 66(1): 43 - 58.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Agronomy.