Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 1994
Published in Agron J 86:799-804 (1994)
© 1994 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinter, L.
Right arrow Articles by Paldi, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pinter, L.
Right arrow Articles by Paldi, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pinter, L.
Right arrow Articles by Paldi, E.

Feed Value of Forage Maize Hybrids Varying in Tolerance to Plant Density

L. Pinter*, Z. Alfoldi and Z. Burucs

Crop Science Dep., Pannon Univ., Georgicon Faculty, P.O. Box 71, H-8361, Hungary

E. Paldi

Agric. Res. Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Martonvasar H-2462, Hungary

* Corresponding author.

The yield response of forage maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes to plant density is not as clear as for grain hybrids, where density tolerant and sensitive types have been identified. A study including field trials, laboratory analyses, and in situ digestibility tests with one density-tolerant and one sensitive hybrid was conducted with plant densities of 4 to 16 plants m–2. The investigations concentrated on stover. There are differences in sensitivity to planting density in forage maize yield. Differences between sensitive and tolerant genotypes in plant density range for maximum yield were 0.43 and 1.18 plants m–2 for grain and forage, respectively. The decreased sensitivity for grain compared with forage was 50.7 and 100.0% for the sensitive and the tolerant hybrid, respectively. It was not possible to separate the tolerant and sensitive hybrids in terms of total digestible nutrients (TON), a measure of overall feed value. For plant densities lower than those required for maximum dry matter yield, there was a significant difference between the tolerant and the sensitive hybrid in TDN.

Received for publication November 19, 1993.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
T. L. Springer and R. L. Gillen
How Does Plant Population Density Affect the Yield, Quality, and Canopy of Native Bluestem (Andropogon spp.) Forage?
Crop Sci., January 22, 2007; 47(1): 77 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
T. L. Springer, C. L. Dewald, P. L. Sims, and R. L. Gillen
How Does Plant Population Density Affect the Forage Yield of Eastern Gamagrass?
Crop Sci., November 1, 2003; 43(6): 2206 - 2211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. G. Lauer, J. G. Coors, and P. J. Flannery
Forage Yield and Quality of Corn Cultivars Developed in Different Eras
Crop Sci., September 1, 2001; 41(5): 1449 - 1455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. A. Cusicanqui and J. G. Lauer
Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Corn Forage Yield and Quality
Agron. J., November 1, 1999; 91(6): 911 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Agronomy.