Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 July 1994
Published in Agron J 86:649-654 (1994)
© 1994 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blackshaw, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blackshaw, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Blackshaw, R. E.

Differential Competitive Ability of Winter Wheat Cultivars against Downy Brome

Robert E. Blackshaw*

Crop Sci. Section, Agric. Res. Stn., Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1., Canada

* Corresponding author.

Downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.) causes large yield reductions in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the western USA and Canada. Current control practices using fallow and preseeding tillage often are ineffective. A study was conducted over 3 yr at Lethbridge, AB, to determine if winter wheat cultivars varying in height and growth habit differ in their competitive ability with downy brome. A factorial set of treatments included downy brome at 0,10,50, and 200 plants m–2 grown with winter wheat cultivars Norstar, Redwin, Archer, and Norwin. Downy brome reduced the biomass and seed yield of all cultivars in all years, but the magnitude of the yield reductions differed among cultivars. Downy brome caused 14 to 30% greater yield reductions in the semidwarf cultivars, Archer and Norwin, than in the tall cultivars, Norstar and Redwin. This differential response among cultivars is partly attributable to competition for light. Norstar and Redwin shaded downy brome for much of the growing season, but Archer and Norwin often were shaded by downy brome. Planting a more competitive cultivar of winter wheat results in higher crop yields and less downy brome seed for weed establishment in subsequent crops. Use of competitive winter wheat cultivars should be a component of integrated weed management systems for downy brome.


Contribution no. 3879360.

Received for publication September 27, 1993.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. C. Zerner, G. S. Gill, and R. K. Vandeleur
Effect of Height on the Competitive Ability of Wheat with Oats
Agron. J., November 7, 2008; 100(6): 1729 - 1734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. L. Zhao, G. N. Atlin, L. Bastiaans, and J. H. J. Spiertz
Cultivar Weed-Competitiveness in Aerobic Rice: Heritability, Correlated Traits, and the Potential for Indirect Selection in Weed-Free Environments
Crop Sci., January 24, 2006; 46(1): 372 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. A. Derksen, R. L. Anderson, R. E. Blackshaw, and B. Maxwell
Weed Dynamics and Management Strategies for Cropping Systems in the Northern Great Plains
Agron. J., March 1, 2002; 94(2): 174 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Agronomy.