Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 March 1994
Published in Agron J 86:238-243 (1994)
© 1994 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fortin, M.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Hamill, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fortin, M.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Hamill, A. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fortin, M.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Hamill, A. S.

Rye Residue Geometry for Faster Corn Development

M.-C. Fortin*

Agric. Canada Res. Branch, Centre for Biol. and Land Resour. Res., 6660 N.W. Marine Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1X2

A. S. Hamill

Agric. Canada Res. Branch, Harrow, ON, Canada NOR 1G0.

* Corresponding author.

Winter cereals used as cover crops in corn (Zea mays L.) production physically modify the soil-plant environment. Springtime killing of the cover crops with herbicides leaves surface residues either standing, flat, or a combination of the two at corn planting. This study was conducted to verify how standing rye (Secale cereale L.) residue affected soil temperature, soil water, and corn development compared with flat rye residue in a sandy loam in Harrow, ON, in 1990, 1991, and 1992. In the 3 yr, volumetric soil water content was similar in both treatments, but seed zone daily maximum temperatures were higher under standing than under flat residue. Corn development in standing residue was faster (2 to 3 d) compared with flat residue, except if seed zone maximum temperatures were regularly in the 28 to 32° range for both treatments, such as in 1991. During vegetative stages in 1990 and 1992, plants in the standing residue were taller than plants in the flat residue. Most of these height differences were related to differences in development that were related to soil temperature. In 1991, however, which was a hot and dry year, phyllochron values indicate that developmental rates under both treatments were affected by a factor other than temperature, most likely by a lack of soil water. In 2 of 3 yr, when seed zone temperatures were often below the optimal range for corn development, standing rye residue resulted in faster plant development than flat rye residue due to a warmer seed zone. Residue treatments did not affect yield.


Contribution from Agric. Canada Centre for Biol. and Land Resour. Res. (No. 93-13) and Harrow Res. Stn.

Received for publication March 11, 1993.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Agronomy.