Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1994
Published in Agron J 86:191-195 (1994)
© 1994 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, D. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, D. S.

Quadratic and Quadratic-Plus-Plateau Models for Predicting Optimal Nitrogen Rate of Corn: A Comparison

Donald G. Bullock* and David S. Bullock

Dep. of Agronomy, 1102 S. Goodwin, Ave.
Dep. of Agric. Economics, 1301 W. Gregory, Dr., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801

* Corresponding author.

Based on quadratic response models, the University of Illinois recommends 22 kg fertilizer N Mg–1 corn (Zea mays L.) grain yield, with adjustments for cropping history, manure, and planting date. Recent work suggests recommendations based on the quadratic model are excessive. This field study evaluated the quadratic-plus-plateau and quadratic models and the current recommendation for a 10- to 12-yr, two-location, two-crop-sequence data set with 5 N fertilizer rates in Illinois. For all location-sequences, we detected a systematic bias with the quadratic model as compared with the quadratic-plus-plateau model. The quadratic response model predicted a maximum grain yield of 3 to 6% larger and an optimal N fertilizer rate 5 to 60% larger than that predicted by the quadratic-plus plateau model and decreased profit from $0.61 to $17.12 ha–1 yr–1. Current University of Illinois recommendations differed by from – 6 to + 104 kg N ha–1 from the amount predicted by the quadratic-plus-plateau and resulted in a profit reduction of $0.01 to $31.42 ha–1 yr–1. These analyses indicate that the quadratic-plus-plateau is preferable to the quadratic model for predicting N fertilizer requirements of corn. Economic analysis indicates that the consequences of using the quadratic model rather than quadratic-plus-plateau model can be large, but not in all cases. Furthermore, the general recommendation of 22 kg N Mg–1 of expected grain yield minus rate adjustments is not appropriate in all cases. Site-specificity plays a large role in determining optimal N rates.

Received for publication March 25, 1993.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. A. Hernandez and D. J. Mulla
Estimating Uncertainty of Economically Optimum Fertilizer Rates
Agron. J., September 1, 2008; 100(5): 1221 - 1229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
X. Q. Liang, H. Li, M. M. He, Y. X. Chen, G. M. Tian, and S. Y. Xu
The Ecologically Optimum Application of Nitrogen in Wheat Season of Rice Wheat Cropping System
Agron. J., January 11, 2008; 100(1): 67 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Waste Manag ResHome page
H. H. Wang, T. K. Tan, and R. T. Schotzko
Interaction of potato production systems and the environment: a case of waste water irrigation in central Washington
Waste Management Research, February 1, 2007; 25(1): 14 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
C. A. Shapiro and C. S. Wortmann
Corn Response to Nitrogen Rate, Row Spacing, and Plant Density in Eastern Nebraska
Agron. J., April 11, 2006; 98(3): 529 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
W. B. Stevens, R. G. Hoeft, and R. L. Mulvaney
Fate of Nitrogen-15 in a Long-Term Nitrogen Rate Study: II. Nitrogen Uptake Efficiency
Agron. J., June 17, 2005; 97(4): 1046 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. Alvarez, H. S. Steinbach, S. M. Grigera, E. Cartier, G. Obregon, S. Torri, and R. Garcia
The Balance Sheet Method as a Conceptual Framework for Nitrogen Fertilization of Wheat in a Pampean Agroecosystem
Agron. J., July 1, 2004; 96(4): 1050 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
G. F. McIsaac, M. B. David, G. Z. Gertner, and D. A. Goolsby
Relating Net Nitrogen Input in the Mississippi River Basin to Nitrate Flux in the Lower Mississippi River: A Comparison of Approaches
J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2002; 31(5): 1610 - 1622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. Makowski, D. Wallach, and J.-M. Meynard
Statistical Methods for Predicting Responses to Applied Nitrogen and Calculating Optimal Nitrogen Rates
Agron. J., May 1, 2001; 93(3): 531 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
G. Bélanger, J. R. Walsh, J. E. Richards, P. H. Milburn, and N. Ziadi
Comparison of Three Statistical Models Describing Potato Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer
Agron. J., September 1, 2000; 92(5): 902 - 908.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Agronomy.