HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gent, M. P. N. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Gent, M. P. N. Agricola Articles by Gent, M. P. N.

Photosynthate Reserves during Grain Filling in Winter Wheat

Dep. of Forestry & Horticulture, Connecticut Agric. Exp. Stn., P.O. Box 1106, New Haven, CT 06504

^* Corresponding author.

How much does stored or reserve photosynthate contribute to grain growth in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)? Three models were developed to assess this contribution. In Model I, all current photosynthate was used for vegetative or reproductive growth, and there was no reserve. In Model II, photosynthate accumulated in a reserve was used preferentially to support maintenance respiration, while current photosynthate accumulated in the grain. In Model III, the maintenance component extracted from the reserve was continuously replenished from current photosynthate, thus requiring a greater contribution from the reserve for dry matter in the grain. Each model related dry matter accumulation at the whole-plant level to photosynthesis, respiration, and the distribution and retention of ¹⁴C from ¹⁴C0₂ assimilated photosynthetically. To test the models, these characteristics were measured in four cultivars of New York soft white winter wheat grown in the field in Connecticut in three years. Observations showed that canopy respiration and grain dry matter accumulation were approximately equal sinks for photosynthate and, together, were greater than canopy photosynthesis late in grain filling. Consequently, in two years, Model I (with no reserve) terminated grain filling early and predicted a lower harvest index than was observed. The observed time course of the distribution and retention of radioactivity from a pulse of ¹⁴C0₂ assimilated photosynthetically was most consistent with predictions of Model III (continuous replenishment of the reserve). In this model, preanthesis reserves contributed from 0.2 to 0.5 of grain dry weight of winter wheat in Connecticut, depending on harvest index. This contribution is expected to exceed 0.5 in more stressful climates.

Received for publication December 11, 1992.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. T. MacKown and B. F. Carver Nitrogn Use and Biomass Distribution in Culms of Winter Wheat Populations Selected from Grain-Only and Dual-Purpose Systems Crop Sci., February 6, 2007; 47(1): 350 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. W. Wall, R. L. Garcia, B. A. Kimball, D. J. Hunsaker, P. J. Pinter Jr., S. P. Long, C. P. Osborne, D. L. Hendrix, F. Wechsung, G. Wechsung, et al. Interactive Effects of Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Drought on Wheat Agron. J., March 2, 2006; 98(2): 354 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Ehdaie, G. A. Alloush, M. A. Madore, and J. G. Waines Genotypic Variation for Stem Reserves and Mobilization in Wheat: I. Postanthesis Changes in Internode Dry Matter Crop Sci., February 24, 2006; 46(2): 735 - 746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Chaves and M. M. Oliveira Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2004; 55(407): 2365 - 2384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Bancal and F. Soltani Source-sink partitioning. Do we need Munch? J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2002; 53(376): 1919 - 1928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]