Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1992
Published in Agron J 84:979-982 (1992)
© 1992 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Santen, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by van Santen, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by van Santen, E.

Animal Preference of Tall Fescue during Reproductive Growth in the Spring

Edzard van Santen*

Dep. of Agronomy and Soils and Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn University, AL 36849-5412

* Corresponding author.

Animal preference may create problems when diverse tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) germplasm is evaluated under grazing. The objective of this experiment was to relate differences in animal preference of tall fescue populations to maturity and genetic background. In 1988,25 entries were established in small plots at the Black Belt Substation, Marion Junction, AL on a Eutaw clay (very-fine, montmorillonitic, thermic, Entic Peluderts) within each of four 0.8-ha pastures. Pastures were grazed during the spring 1990 and 1991 seasons at stocking rates of 2.5,3.75,5.0, and 6.25 crossbred yearling Angus steers ha±1 (Bos spp.). Animal preference was measured by visually rating the amount of forage removed at 3, 6, and 13 d after grazing was begun in 1990, and after 3 and 6 d in 1991. Population-by-stocking-rate interaction was significant for all preference ratings, but accounted for only 2 to 5% of the total variation. Changes in magnitude were not important. Based on bivariate plots of preference during spring reproductive growth vs. maturity, three groups were distinguishable: (i) two very early maturing populations with a low preference score, (ii) a group of 17 medium-maturing populations with a medium to low preference score, and (iii) six late maturing populations with a high preference score. Low preference during grazing of tall fescue during spring reproductive growth was an attribute of mediterranean germplasm and of populations selected in the southern USA. A comparison of ‘Georgia 5’ EI vs. EF tall fescue revealed that cattle preferred the endophyte free material at all rating times during reproductive growth in the spring in both years. This preference can be uniquely attributed to the absence of the endophytic fungus Acremonium coenophialum Morgan-Jones and Gams.


This research was supported by Hatch Funds allocated to the Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn. AAES Journal no. 3-913178.

Received for publication November 22, 1991.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
B. F. Tracy and I. J. Renne
Reinfestation of Endophtye-Infected Tall Fescue in Renovated Endophyte-Free Pastures under Rotational Stocking
Agron. J., October 19, 2005; 97(6): 1473 - 1477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. A. Hopkins
Grazing Tolerance of Cool-Season Grasses Planted as Seeded Sward Plots and Spaced Plants
Crop Sci., June 24, 2005; 45(4): 1559 - 1564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. Vaylay and E. van Santen
Application of Canonical Discriminant Analysis for the Assessment of Genetic Variation in Tall Fescue
Crop Sci., March 1, 2002; 42(2): 534 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
K. Clay
Symbiosis and the Regulation of Communities
Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2001; 41(4): 810 - 824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Agronomy.