HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Paris, Q. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Paris, Q. Agricola Articles by Paris, Q.

The Return of von Liebig's "Law of the Minimum"

Dep. of Agricultural Economics, Univ of California, Davis, CA 95616,

^* Corresponding author.

The development of optimal fertilizer recommendations requires a renewed collaborative effort between agronomists and agricultural economists. The purpose of this study is to emphasize the direction of this interdisciplinary effort in the area of crop response analysis. Using information from two separate experiments [corn (Zea mays L.) response to N and P fertilization and cotton lint (Gossypium hirsutum) response to N and irrigation water], it is shown that the best response model is a von Liebig specification, more commonly known as the law of the minimum. When the selection of a statistical specification is made among models that do not share the parameter space, hypothesis testing cannot be done by means of the familiar F-test and likelihood ratio. The selection of the von Liebig specification (chosen against square-root polynomial and Mitscherlich-Baule models) is, thus, made on the basis of a rigorous statistical analysis using a nonnested hypothesis approach.

Received for publication May 21, 1991.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. M. Dudley and U. Shani Modeling Plant Response to Drought and Salt Stress: Reformulation of the Root-Sink Term Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2003; 2(4): 751 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Rubio, J. Zhu, and J. P. Lynch A critical test of the two prevailing theories of plant response to nutrient availability Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2003; 90(1): 143 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]