Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 1992
Published in Agron J 84:391-394 (1992)
© 1992 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feyerherm, A.M.
Right arrow Articles by Paulsen, G.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Feyerherm, A.M.
Right arrow Articles by Paulsen, G.M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Feyerherm, A.M.
Right arrow Articles by Paulsen, G.M.

Utilizing Genotype-by-Weather Interactions for Selecting Wheat Cultivars

A.M. Feyerherm*

Dep. of Statistics and Statistical Lab

R.G. Sears and G.M. Paulsen

Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506

* Corresponding author.

Crop cultivars should be widely adapted to varying climatic regions for optimum performance, but genotype by weather interactions often limit adaptation to subregions. Our objective was to quantify genotype by weather interaction effects between pairs of cultivars and thereby identify subregions where new cultivars could be expected to outyield established ones with prescribed confidence. Genotype by weather interaction effects were quantified by regressing yield differences (D) between a new and an established cultivar on weather variables using cultivar performance trial data for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). A predicted value (D) was assumed to estimate the mean, E(D), of a hypothetical population of performance trials for a specified location-year. If the 95% confidence interval for E(D) covered only positive values, it is highly likely that E(D) was greater than zero and the new cultivar outyielded the established one in that location-year. For a specific location, inferences were extended to years not included in model development using the regression equation and associated confidence intervals for E(D). Results indicated that a new cultivar Karl would have outyielded a popular cultivar Newton in more than 50% of the years from 1950 through 1989 at locations in Kansas with mean annual precipitation exceeding 711 mm. Further, the mean yield of Karl would have exceeded that of another popular cultivar Arkan in over 50% of the years over all of Kansas. The methodology for quantifying genotype by weather interactions and extending results to years not included in model development provides important information for recommending new cultivars for specific subregions.


Contribution no. 91-240-J of the Kansas Agric. Exp. STn.

Received for publication March 1, 1991.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. M. Feyerherm, G. M. Paulsen, and A. K. Fritz
A Statistical Method for Summarizing Results of Cultivar Performance Trials
Agron. J., July 1, 2004; 96(4): 992 - 996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Agronomy.