HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ungar, E.D. Articles by Genizi, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Ungar, E.D. Articles by Genizi, A. Agricola Articles by Ungar, E.D. Articles by Genizi, A.

Conservative Response and Stress-Damage Interactions in Cotton Reproductive Development

Dep. of Natural Resources
Extension Service, Israel Ministry of Agriculture, Hadera, Israel
Dep. of Statistics and Operations Research, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, P.O.B. 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel

^* Corresponding author.

Increasing costs of inputs in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) have highlighted the need for more sophisticated within-season management of the crop. The objective of this study was to investigate the interaction between the timing of water stress and simulated pest damage in their effects on cotton yield and yield components. A field experiment was repeated throughout 5 yr on a Gan Shmuel vertisol (clayey, montmorillonitic, calcareous, thermic Typic Cbromoxerert). Treatments comprised a control [post-emergence irrigations at first flower (f), f+23, and f+38 d]; a delay in this sequence from the first (f+ 8, f+ 33, and f+ 47 d), second (f, f+ 32, and f+ 46 d), or third irrigation (f,f+23, and f+48 d); four irrigations (f–9,f+ 12,f+ 27, and f+ 40 d); and severe mid-season stress (f–10, f+ 23, and f+38 d). Total irrigation amount was constant. The dates of the six irrigation schedules were repeated with pest damage simulated by the early removal of 120 floral buds meter–². There was a significant stress-damage interaction in flower, boll, and fiber production. In comparison with the undamaged control, boll production was reduced by damage alone and by stress alone. All stress-damage combinations, however, restored boll production to the control level. Only severe mid-season stress without damage, reduced seed cotton yield. Treatment effects were detected despite an underlying conservatism in crop response, whereby flower retention was inversely related to flower production. This resulted in low variability of boll number. The effect of boll number on yield was in turn buffered by boll weight. Consequently, irrigation scheduling and the control of pests that damage fruiting bodies cannot be optimized independently.

Received for publication December 18, 1990.