Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 March 1992
Published in Agron J 84:159-165 (1992)
© 1992 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meisner, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Karnok, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Meisner, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Karnok, K. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Meisner, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Karnok, K. J.

Peanut Root Response to Drought Stress

C. A. Meisner and K. J. Karnok

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Lisboa 27, Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico D.F. Mexico
Dep. of Agronomy, 3114 Miller Plant Science Building University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602

Knowledge concerning the response of peanut [Arachis hypogaea (L.)] root growth during stress and to irrigation after stress is limited. This study was conducted to determine the effect of timing of water stress imposition on peanut root growth, reproductive development, and pod yield. Root growth was measured weekly using nondestructive methods in rhizotron chambers containing a 4:1 mixture of sand and fritted (calcified) clay. A portable rain shelter was used to impose 30-d stress treatments beginning at 20, 50, 80, and 110 d after planting (DAP), in addition to a well-watered control. Root growth was significantly reduced in the upper 40-cm depth during stress from 20 to 50 DAP compared to root growth during the same period of the wellwatered control. No other stress periods resulted in significantly altered root growth compared to the control. Root growth was not affected in the lower depths of this treatment by stress because of adequate soil moisture. Upon rewatering, there was a trend for root growth to recover and continue further into the season for the two stress treatments beginning at 20 and 50 DAP. By the end of the season, there were no differences in overall average root growth among treatments. Peanut root growth may be temporarily reduced during early stress but appears to recover once rewatered. Pod yields were reduced, 49 and 37%, compared with the control by stress imposed at 50 and 80 DAP, respectively. Thus, adequate moisture during 50 to 80 and 80 to 110 DAP is critical for obtaining maximum yields.


Contribution of Georgia Agric. Exp. Stn., Athens.

Received for publication October 15, 1990.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
Z. Plaut and M. Ben-Hur
Irrigation Management of Peanut with a Moving Sprinkler System: Runoff, Yield, and Water Use Efficiency
Agron. J., July 13, 2005; 97(4): 1202 - 1209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Agronomy.