Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1992
Published in Agron J 84:78-86 (1992)
© 1992 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Shouse, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Shouse, P. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Shouse, P. J.

Measuring Plant and Soil Water Potentials with Thermocouple Psychrometers: Some Concerns

R. W. Brown* and Peter J. Shouse

USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Res. Stn., Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 860 North 1200 East, Logan, Utah 84321
Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701

* Corresponding author.

Thermocouple psychrometers are commonly used to measure soil and plant water status. Users often assume that these instruments can be used routinely with little regard for understanding how they operate, or for the precautions required for accurate measurements of water potential. Poor procedures and inadequate attention to both practical and theoretical requirements can jeopardize the successful performance of these highly sensitive instruments. For example, in addition to understanding the theory of operation of thermocouple psychrometers, calibration and proper cleaning of these instruments are among the most important steps in successfully using them. Important sampling precautions include consistency of technique, prevention of evaporative loss during collection and sealing, and careful sample selection. Major concerns during measurements of water potential include achieving complete vapor pressure equilibrium, interpreting data, and detecting and preventing temperature gradients. Although many precautions for in situ measurements are similar to those for measuring soil and plant samples, each use has specific requirements. Thermocouple psychrometers are useful for accurate and reliable measurements of water potential if proper techniques and precautions are used.


Published with the approval of the Director, Agric. Exp. Stn., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR.

Received for publication February 20, 1991.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
N. C. Turner, K. A. Shackel, and I. F. Le Coultre
Leaf-Cutter Psychrometers: A Cautionary Note
Agron. J., May 1, 2000; 92(3): 538 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
C. S. Campbell and K. J. McInnes
Response of In Situ Leaf Psychrometer to Cuticle Removal by Abrasion
Agron. J., September 1, 1999; 91(5): 859 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Agronomy.