Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1992
Published in Agron J 84:71-78 (1992)
© 1992 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aggarwal, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Aggarwal, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, R. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Aggarwal, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, R. A.

Resource Use and Plant Interactions in a Rice-Mungbean Intercrop

P. K. Aggarwal

Water Technology Centre, Indian Agric. Res. Inst., New Delhi—110012, India

D. P. Garrity* and S. P. Liboon

Agronomy, Physiology and Agroecology Division, International Rice Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, 1099 Manila, Philippines

R. A. Morris

Department of Soil Science, Strand Agric. Hall 202, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331

* Corresponding author.

Intercropping of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) with short-duration grain legumes has shown promising productivity and resource use efficiency. To better understand intercrop relationships, we used aboveand underground partitions, residue removal, and plant removal to investigate the interactions between upland rice (120-d crop duration) and mungbean [Vigna radiata (L) Wilczek, 65-d crop duration]. Treatments were evaluated during two rainy seasons on an unfertilized Typic Tropudalf at Los Bafios, Philippines. Nitrogen uptake by intercropped rice (33.4 and 41.1 kg N ha–1) approximated that of sole rice (35.4 and 38.1 kg N ha–1). Intercropped rice yielded 73 to 87% of sole rice and intercropped mungbeans yielded 59 to 99% of sole mungbean. Root barriers did not affect rice N uptake or dry matter accumulation prior to the maturity of the mungbean, but reduced N uptake, dry matter, and grain yields substantially by the time of rice harvest. Sole rice with every third row removed at mungbean harvest had N, grain, and dry matter yields similar to the intercropped rice with every third row occupied by the legume. Sole rice with every third row vacant during the entire growing season yielded similarly (2.6 Mg h–1) to sole rice (2.3 Mg h–1) and intercropped rice (2.0 Mg h–1). There was no evidence that N transfer from the legume to the rice increased N availability to rice above that expected with a sole rice crop with the same planting scheme. Rice yield compensation in the intercrop was apparently due to the increased soil volume for N extraction and increased aerial space available after mungbean harvest.

Received for publication August 13, 1990.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Agronomy.