HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Villalobos, F. J. Articles by Fereres, E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Villalobos, F. J. Articles by Fereres, E. Agricola Articles by Villalobos, F. J. Articles by Fereres, E.

Evaporation Measurements beneath Corn, Cotton, and Sunflower Canopies

Dpto. Hortofruticultura. Servicio Investigation Agraria, Junta de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
Servicio Investigacio Agraria and Univ. of Cordoba, Apdo.240, 14071 Cordoba, Spain

^* Corresponding author.

Experiments were conducted at Cordoba (southern Spain) between 1986 and 1988 to obtain independent estimates of evaporation from the soil (E) and crop transpiration (T) in irrigated corn (Zea mays L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Microlysimeters that allowed root exploration were used to estimate E by differential weighing. Cotton and sunflower evapotranspiration (ET) were measured with a weighing lysimeter (3 by 2 by 1.5 m), while corn ET was estimated using a water balance technique. Root density and soil water content inside the open microlysinteters were similar to those measured in the surrounding soil. Estimated E, when the soil surface was wet, varied from 80% of reference ET (ET₀) at 0.8 leaf area index (LAI) to 15% when LAI increased to four. A single relationship between E/ET₀ and LAI fit the data for the three crops. The estimated E values for periods spanning 30 to 40 d, when LAI increased from 0.7 to 5, was 20 to 27% of measured ET, for an irrigation frequency of 7 to 8 d. The T values, calculated as the difference between ET and E, varied for a given LAI depending on the E level. When the soil surface was dry and E was low, the ratio, T/ET₀, in cotton was 1.1 for a LAI of three. If the surface soil was wetted by rain or irrigation, the calculated T/ET₀ ratio dropped to 0.58 the 1st d after wetting. The results highlight the interdependence of the E and T processes in the consumptive use of water by row crops.

Received for publication April 17, 1989.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. X. Lopez-Cedron, K. J. Boote, J. Pineiro, and F. Sau Improving the CERES-Maize Model Ability to Simulate Water Deficit Impact on Maize Production and Yield Components Agron. J., February 26, 2008; 100(2): 296 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Sau, K. J. Boote, W. M. Bostick, J. W. Jones, and M. I. Minguez Testing and Improving Evapotranspiration and Soil Water Balance of the DSSAT Crop Models Agron. J., September 1, 2004; 96(5): 1243 - 1257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. E. Abbate, J. L. Dardanelli, M. G. Cantarero, M. Maturano, R. J. M. Melchiori, and E. E. Suero Climatic and Water Availability Effects on Water-Use Efficiency in Wheat Crop Sci., March 1, 2004; 44(2): 474 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]