Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1990
Published in Agron J 82:1141-1148 (1990)
© 1990 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hubbard, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hubbard, K. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hubbard, K. G.

Soil Water Assessment Model for Several Crops in the High Plains

J. M. Robinson and K. G. Hubbard*

Agric. Engineering, Doran Building, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Dep. Agric. Meteorol., Chase Hall, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583

* Corresponding author.

Soil properties, soil water content and precipitation vary widely within the High Plains of the USA. Reliable estimates of crop water status have been hampered by a general sparsity of soil water monitoring. This study examined the feasibility of determining soil water status using a soil water balance model. Soil water content was measured under corn (Zea mays L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), sorghum (Sorghum vulgare L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) at different sites in the High Plains during 1986 and 1987. Surface weather data collected from the High Plains Automated Weather Data Network (AWDN) served as input to a model that estimates evapotranspiration (ET) and soil water content on a daily time step. Atmospheric demand was represented by potential evapotranspiration (ETp) calculated from the Penman method. Model estimates of total water in the root mne were compared to measured values using statistical measures including the D index of agreement. Comparison at one site between measured and estimated soil water by individual soil layers beneath a corn indicated that water content was slightly underestimated in the upper layers and overestimated in the lower layers. The performance of the model in estimating total soil water over a range of soil types, crops and weather was satisfactory, with the majority of D index values exceeding 0.75. Based on the results of this study, we conclude that it is now possible to accurately estimate soil water conditions in a timely fashion under reasonably flat terrain, provided near-real time weather data are available.


Contribution from Agric. Res. Div., Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE. Published as Paper no. 8974 Journal Series, Agric. Res. Div.

Received for publication July 7, 1989.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
K. G. Hubbard and H. Wu
Modification of a Crop-Specific Drought Index for Simulating Corn Yield in Wet Years
Agron. J., October 19, 2005; 97(6): 1478 - 1484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
J. C. Rogers
Applied climatology
Progress in Physical Geography, June 1, 1994; 18(2): 271 - 275.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Agronomy.