Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 July 1990
Published in Agron J 82:800-805 (1990)
© 1990 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Temple, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Temple, P. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Temple, P. J.

Water Relations of Differentially Irrigated Cotton Exposed to Ozone

Patrick J. Temple*

Statewide Air Pollution Res. Cent., Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521

* Corresponding author.

This field study was conducted to test the hypothesis that plants chronically exposed to O3 may be more susceptible to drought kcause OM3 typically inhibits root growth and increases shoot-root ratios in plants. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Acala SJ-2) was grown in open-top chambers on Hanford coarse sandy loam (coarseloamy, mixed, non-acid, thermic, Typic Xerorthents) in Riverside, CA. Plants were grown under three irrigation regimes: optimum water for lint production (OW), suboptimum or moderate drought stress (SO), and severely drought stressed (SS) and were exposed to seasonal 12 h (0800–2000) O3 concentrations of 0.015, 0.074, 0.094, or 0.111 µL L–1. Leaf xylem pressure potentials ({Psi}1) and soil water content ({Psi}v) were measured weekly from June to October. Mean seasonal {Psi}1 increased from –1.89 MPa to –1.72 MPa in low to high O3 treatments, averaged across soil water regimes. Ozone had no effect on seasonal water use of cotton, but water use efficiency was significantly reduced by O3 in OW and SO, but noit in SS treatments. Drought-stressed plants extracted proportionally greater amounts of water from deeper in the soil profile than OW cotton, and O3 had no apparent effect on this redistribution of roots in the soil. Since O3 had no apparent effect on the ability of droughtstressed cotton to maintain {Psi}1 and to increase root growth relative to shoot growth, this suggests that O3 may have little or no effect: on the potential of cotton to adapt to or tolerate drought.


Contribution of the Statewide Air Pollution Res. Cent., Univ. of California, Riverside.

Received for publication January 23, 1989.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. A. Grantz and A. Shrestha
Tropospheric Ozone and Interspecific Competition between Yellow Nutsedge and Pima Cotton
Crop Sci., July 25, 2006; 46(5): 1879 - 1889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Agronomy.