Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 July 1990
Published in Agron J 82:664-668 (1990)
© 1990 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morris, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Centeno, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Morris, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Centeno, H. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Morris, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Centeno, H. S.

Water Use by Monocropped and Intercropped Cowpea and Sorghum Grown after Rice

R. A. Morris*

Dep. of Soil Sci., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331

A. N. Villegas, A. Polthanee and H. S. Centeno

Multiple Cropping Dep., Int. Rice Res. Inst., P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines

* Corresponding author.

Water remaining in the soil after flooded rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a major source for crops grown during the dry season. To develop improved management systems, quantitative information describing water extraction from previously puddled and flooded fields is needed. Water used by monocropped and intercropped cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] and sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] treatments grown on a fine, mixed, nonacid isohyperthermic Andaqueptic Haplaquoll after harvesting flooded rice was compared to water lost from a fallow treatment. Determinations were to 1.1 m. Water used before cowpea harvest was similar within a treatment among years, but among treatments monocropped cowpea used 172 mm, monocropped sorghum 135 mm, the intercrop 162 mm, and fallow 121 mm. Water used between cowpea and sorghum harvests ranged from 22 to 118 mm, varying with rainfall after cowpea harvest. Species were compared by expressing grain yields in Mg glucose hectare–1 required to synthesize grain. Glucose equivalent yields from monocropped cowpea ranged from 1.90 to 1.98 Mg glucose ha–1, monocropped sorghum from 1.99 to 3.66 Mg glucose ha–1, and the intercrop from 1.99 to 4.36 Mg glucose ha–1. Mean water use efficiency by monocropped cowpea, monocropped sorghum, and the intercrop was 11.3, 12.4, and 16.5 kg glucose ha–1 mm–1. Monocropped cowpea and the cowpea-sorghum intercrop each use about 50% more water than is lost from fallow. Whereas the cowpea monocrop and the intercrop use about the same quantities of water when grown during the dry season after rice, the intercrop will use water more efficiently but yields from it will not be as stable as those from monocropped cowpea.


Contribution from the Multiple Cropping Dep., IRRI.

Received for publication November 21, 1988.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Agronomy.