Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 1989
Published in Agron J 81:765-770 (1989)
© 1989 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halim, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Halim, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Halim, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, R. E.

Water-Deficit Effects on Alfalfa at Various Growth Stages

R. A. Halim, D. R. Buxton*, M. J. Hattendorf and R. E. Carlson

Agronomy Dep., Univ. of Agriculture, 43400 Serdang, Malaysia
USDA-ARS, 1565 Agronomy Hall, Iowa State Univ.
USDA-ARS, P. O. Box 30, Prosser WA 99350
Agronomy Dep., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011

* Corresponding author.

Studies of waterdeficit effects on forage quality of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) have generally considered water stress throughout plant growth. This experiment was conducted to compare, with an unstressed control, the effects of short-term soil-water deficits occurring at three growth stages. Plants were grown in 100-L containers set into the ground and protected with an automatic rain-out shelter. Control treatments were watered weekly or twice weekly to raise the soil-water level to field capacity. Watering was excluded during the third or fourth week of regrowth for plants that were stressed at vegetative and bud stages, respectively. For plants stressed at the flower stage, watering was excluded during the sixth or seventh week. Plants were harvested at five weekly intervals beginning 21 d after an initial defoliation. Stress at the bud or flower stages reduced leaf-to-stem ratio (LSR) by 25 and 38% of control, respectively. Stress at the vegetative stage did not affect LSR. As a result of lower LSR, in vitro digestible dry matter (IVDDM) in plants stressed at the bud or flower stages was 4% less than that of the control. The IVDDM of herbage in plants stressed at the vegetative stage was not different from the control. Crude protein (CP) concentration in stems increased by up to 8% of the control when plants were stressed at the vegetative or bud stages. Concentration of CP in leaves of stressed plants was 5 to 11% less than that of the control. Herbage CP concentration was up to 12% less than that of the control with stress at the bud or flower stages. Cell wall (CW) concentration in stems and total herbage was generally lower in plants stressed at the vegetative and bud stages. After rewatering, forage quality recovered in plants stressed at the bud stage. Most of the decline in forage quality due to stress at the bud or flower stages was caused by reduction in LSR and deterioration of leaf quality.


Joint contribution of the USDA-ARS Iowa Cluster Program of the U.S. Dairy Forage Res. Ctr. and the Agronomy Dep., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011. Journal Paper No. J-13126 of the Iowa Agric. and Home Economics Exp. Stn., Ames, IA. Projects No. 2709 and 1297.

Received for publication July 5, 1988.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Agronomy.