Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 1989
Published in Agron J 81:749-752 (1989)
© 1989 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Branham, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Danneberger, T. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Branham, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Danneberger, T. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Branham, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Danneberger, T. K.

Growth Suppression of ‘Kenblue’ Kentucky Bluegrass Using Plant Growth Regulators and Degree Day Application Timing

B. E. Branham* and T. K. Danneberger

Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Dep. of Agronomy, Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210

* Corresponding author.

Plant growth regulator (PGR) applications for seedhead and vegetative growth suppression have given inconsistent results from year to year when application timing is based on calendar days. Application timing based on growing degree days (GDD) should provide uniform and consistent results over time. These field studies were conducted to determine the window of application, based on GDD, for seedhead and vegetative growth suppression of Kentucky bluegrass. Mefluidide (N-|2,4-dimethyl-5-[[(trifluoromethyl)-sulfonyl] amino] phenyl] acetamide) at 0.28 kg ha–1 and amidochlor (N-[(acetylamino) methyl]-2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl) acetamide) at 2.8 kg ha–1 were applied to a uniform stand of Kentucky bluegrass [Poa pratensis (L.) ‘Kenblue’] at 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 GDD. Trials were conducted at East Lansing, MI in 1985 and 1986, and Columbus, OH in 1986. Soil type at East Lansing was an Owosso-Marlette sandy loam complex (fine-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Glossoboric Hapludalf). Soil at Columbus was a Brookston silty-clay loam (fine-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Agriaquoll). Application of PGR between 25 and 125 GDD provided excellent (>86%) seedhead control. Mefluidide and amidochlor applications at 150 GDD gave 31 and 24% seedhead control, respectively, indicating that seedhead control was lost with this application timing. Clipping weights at East Lansing varied between years with only the 150 GDD application in 1985 and the 75 GDD application in 1986 differing significantly from the other application timings. However, the 75 GDD treatment in 1986 had reduced PGR activity because of rainfall 5 h after application. Application timing of PGR appeared to have no significant effect on the degree of vegetative growth suppression. However, GDD timed PGR applications are a valid technique for seedhead control in Kentucky bluegrass.


Contribution from Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci. and the Michigan Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal no. 12291.

Received for publication April 30, 1987.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Agronomy.