HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carmer, S. G. Articles by Walker, W. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Carmer, S. G. Articles by Walker, W. M. Agricola Articles by Carmer, S. G. Articles by Walker, W. M.

Least Significant Differences for Combined Analyses of Experiments with Two- or Three-Factor Treatment Designs

Dep. of Agronomy, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Dep. of Agronomy, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
Dep. of Agronomy, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801

^* Corresponding author.

Many agronomic experiments with complete factorial treatment designs are conducted in two or more environments. If at least one of the treatment factors is qualitative, the combined analysis may appropriately include pairwise comparisons of various treatment means averaged over environments. Heretofore, however, formulae for estimation of the variances of pairwise mean differences, which are needed for the calculation of least significant differences (or other mean separation procedures), have not been available in either the agronomic or statistical literature. The main purpose of this paper is to provide the formulae for estimation of these variances so that researchers can use them in testing the significance of differences among various treatment means averaged over environments. Emphasis is given to combined analyses of series of experiments in which the effects of experiments are considered to be random; individual experiments are assumed to have complete factorial treatment designs involving either two or three factors of which at least one is qualitative. All treatment effects, including main effects and interactions, are considered to be fixed effects. Formulae applicable to commonly used experimental designs are presented for the estimation of variances for the five categories of pairprise mean differences in two-factor treatment designs and the 19 categories of pairwise mean differences in three-factor treatment designs. Experimental design considerations and the implications of assuming random (versus fixed) experiment effects as well as the structure of the treatment x experiment interactions are studied. Pooling portions of the treatment x experiment interaction with error mean squares are considered, and suggestions are given for cases where some of the treatment factors are quantitative rather than qualitative.

Received for publication May 2, 1988.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. K. Hanson, B. L. Johnson, R. A. Henson, and N. R. Riveland Seeding Rate, Seeding Depth, and Cultivar Influence on Spring Canola Performance in the Northern Great Plains Agron. J., August 11, 2008; 100(5): 1339 - 1346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. Berti, B. L. Johnson, R. W. Gesch, and F. Forcella Cuphea Seed Yield Response to Harvest Methods Applied on Different Dates Agron. J., June 23, 2008; 100(4): 1138 - 1144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Carley, D. L. Jordan, L. C. Dharmasri, T. B. Sutton, R. L. Brandenburg, and M. G. Burton Peanut Response to Planting Date and Potential of Canopy Reflectance as an Indicator of Pod Maturation Agron. J., February 26, 2008; 100(2): 376 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. W. Walker, J. A. Bond, B. V. Ottis, P. D. Gerard, and D. L. Harrell Hybrid Rice Response to Nitrogen Fertilization for Midsouthern United States Rice Production Agron. J., February 26, 2008; 100(2): 381 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Bond, T. W. Walker, B. V. Ottis, and D. L. Harrell Rice Seeding and Nitrogen Rate Effects on Yield and Yield Components of Two Rice Cultivars Agron. J., February 26, 2008; 100(2): 393 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. C. Helms, B. J. Werk, B. D. Nelson, and E. Deckard Soybean Tolerance to Water-Saturated Soil and Role of Resistance to Phytophthora sojae Crop Sci., November 7, 2007; 47(6): 2295 - 2302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. W. Walker, S. W. Martin, and P. D. Gerard Grain Yield and Milling Quality Response of Two Rice Cultivars to Top-Dress Nitrogen Application Timings Agron. J., October 3, 2006; 98(6): 1495 - 1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. E. Marriott and M. M. Wander Total and Labile Soil Organic Matter in Organic and Conventional Farming Systems Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., April 19, 2006; 70(3): 950 - 959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Bond, T. W. Walker, P. K. Bollich, C. H. Koger, and P. Gerard Seeding Rates for Stale Seedbed Rice Production in the Midsouthern United States Agron. J., October 19, 2005; 97(6): 1560 - 1563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. E. Miguez and G. A. Bollero Review of Corn Yield Response under Winter Cover Cropping Systems Using Meta-Analytic Methods Crop Sci., September 23, 2005; 45(6): 2318 - 2329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. W. Barker and J. E. Sawyer Nitrogen Application to Soybean at Early Reproductive Development Agron. J., March 1, 2005; 97(2): 615 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. L. Johnson and B. K. Hanson Row-Spacing Interactions on Spring Canola Performance in the Northern Great Plains Agron. J., May 1, 2003; 95(3): 703 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Limon-Ortega, K. D. Sayre, and C. A. Francis Wheat and Maize Yields in Response to Straw Management and Nitrogen under a Bed Planting System Agron. J., March 1, 2000; 92(2): 295 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Limon-Ortega, K. D. Sayre, and C. A. Francis Wheat Nitrogen Use Efficiency in a Bed Planting System in Northwest Mexico Agron. J., March 1, 2000; 92(2): 303 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				T. L. Henderson, B. L. Johnson, and A. A. Schneiter Row Spacing, Plant Population, and Cultivar Effects on Grain Amaranth in the Northern Great Plains Agron. J., March 1, 2000; 92(2): 329 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. Schittenhelm Agronomic Performance of Root Chicory, Jerusalem Artichoke, and Sugarbeet in Stress and Nonstress Environments Crop Sci., November 1, 1999; 39(6): 1815 - 1823. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				B.A. Needelman, M.M. Wander, G.A. Bollero, C.W. Boast, G.K. Sims, and D.G. Bullock Interaction of Tillage and Soil Texture: Biologically Active Soil Organic Matter in Illinois Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 1999; 63(5): 1326 - 1334. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M.M. Wander and G.A. Bollero Soil Quality Assessment of Tillage Impacts in Illinois Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 1999; 63(4): 961 - 971. [Abstract] [Full Text]