Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 July 1989
Published in Agron J 81:557-559 (1989)
© 1989 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baethgen, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Alley, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baethgen, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Alley, M. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Baethgen, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Alley, M. M.

Quadratic Programming Method for Determining Optimum Nitrogen Rates for Winter Wheat During Tillering

W. E. Baethgen

Agro-Economic Div., Int. Fertilizer Develop. Ctr, Muscle Shoals, AL 35660

D. B. Taylor and M. M. Alley*

Deps. of Agric. Econ. and Agronomy,, Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ.,, Blacksburg, VA 24061.

* Corresponding author.

The objective of this study was to determine the recommended amount of N fertilizer to be applied to winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at Zadoks growth stage (GS) 25 that would optimize the use of a model previously developed to predict N required at GS 30. Quadratic programming models were developed for six experimental sites in Virginia to maximize marginal profit with N fertilizer application. First, the models were solved to determine the amounts of N necessary at GS 25 and at GS 30 to produce maximum profit. Then, four N fertilizer rates at GS 25 (N25) (0, 30,60, and 100 kg N ha–1) were evaluated by replacing the N25 value with each of these four predetermined amounts, and to again determine maximum profit. The difference (D) between the yields with maximum attainable profit (Y) without replacing N25 and the yields in which N25 was replaced With 0,30,60, and 100 kg N ha–1 (YR) was then calculated (D = Y –YR). The best N25 recommendation was selected as the one that minimized the mean value and standard deviation of D. This method was used for three N fertilizer:wheat price ratios (2.0,4.0, and 8.0). The results indicated that the best recommendations for N25 were 50 to 60 kg N ha–1 for N fertilizer:wheat price ratios of 2.0 and 4.0, and 40 to 50 kg N ha–1 for a price ratio of 8.0.


Contribution of the Deps. of Agric. Econ. and Agronomy, Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ. Research was partially supported by grants from the Potash and Phosphate Inst. and the Foundation for Agronomic Res.

Received for publication July 6, 1987.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
P. C. Scharf, N. R. Kitchen, K. A. Sudduth, and J. G. Davis
Spatially Variable Corn Yield is a Weak Predictor of Optimal Nitrogen Rate
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 27, 2006; 70(6): 2154 - 2160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
P. C. Scharf, N. R. Kitchen, K. A. Sudduth, J. G. Davis, V. C. Hubbard, and J. A. Lory
Field-Scale Variability in Optimal Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate for Corn
Agron. J., March 1, 2005; 97(2): 452 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Agronomy.