Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 1989
Published in Agron J 81:529-532 (1989)
© 1989 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guy, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Grau, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Guy, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Grau, C. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Guy, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Grau, C. R.

Soybean Cultivar Response to Metalaxyl Applied In Furrow and as a Seed Treatment

S. O. Guy and E. S. Oplinger*

Dep. of Agronomy, 1575 Linden Dr.

C. R. Grau

Dep. of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706

* Corresponding author.

Phytophthora root rot of soybean [Glycine max (L.)Merr.], caused by Phytophthoru megasperma Drechs, f. sp. glycineu Kaun and Erwin, is a major disease problem in the Upper Midwest. This study was conducted to determine soybean performance with metalaxyl IN- (2,6-dimethyl phenyl)-N-(methylacety1)alanine methyl ester] fungicide on cultivars with different resistance and tolerance to this disease under low to moderate Phytophthora root rot potentials. Yield, plant density, and a Phytophthora root rot index were determined for metalaxyl treatments applied at labeled rates in furrow (IF) and as a seed treatment (ST) on 10 cultivars in two Wisconsin locations in 1985 and 1986, and IF at 0, 85, 170, and 340 g ai. ha–1 on five cultivars at two 1987 locations. Yields of two, four, and five cultivars were increased by metalaxyl ST, IF, or IF+ ST treatments, respectively, in two moderate Phytophthora root rot diseased environments. Soybean yields with ST did not differ from IF for any cultivar. The cultivar Am00 with IF+ST treatment yielded more than IF alone. The AP200 plant stand at V2 stage was increased by IFfST compared with the control. In furrow metalaxyl treatment decreased plant stand compared with ST for ‘S18-84’. In two 1985 and 1986 environments, without detected Phytophthora root rot, soybean yields were decreased by 280 g ha–1 metalaxyl applied IF at 0.42, 0.25, 0.26, and 0.20 Mg ha–1 for S18-84, AP200, ‘Century 84’, and ‘L1771’, respectively. However, in additional studies conducted in 1987 at two locations in the absence of Phytophthora root rot, metalaxyl applied at 85 to 340 g ha–1 IF did not influence the yield of five cultivars. Metalaxyl can be an effective fungicide for soybean Phytophthora root rot control; however, yield for certain cultivars may be adversely affected where there is no disease control benefit.


Submitted as partial fulfillment of requirements for the Ph.D. degree in Agronomy by senior author. This research was supported in part by grants from Ciba-Geigy Co., Graduate School, and College of Agric. and Life Sci. as Federal Hatch project 1890.

Received for publication June 27, 1988.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Agronomy.