|
|
||||||||
Dep. of Agriculture, Univ. Centre of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.
* Corresponding author.
Plant population density (PPD) exerts a strong influence on maize (Zea mays L.) growth and grain yield. Most PPD studies have usually confounded plant number with spatial arrangement, since row width remained constant and only spacing between plants in row was varied. This study used a systematic design (fan) to observe the effect of 15 PPD (0.8
15.4 plants m–2) on maize reproductive growth in constant spatial arrangement on Lake fine sand (hyperthermic, coated Typic Quartzipsamments) at Gainesville, FL (29°38'N), in 1985 and 1986. All plants produced at least one ear over the 15 PPD range. Ear 2 and Ear 3 were lost at 4.3 and 2.8 plants m 2, respectively The kernel row number per ear (KRNE), kernel number per ear row (KNER), and kernel number per ear (KNE) were influenced by PPD and differed (P < 0.05) among ears (Ear 1 > Ear 2 > Ear 3). Mean kernel weight (WK) was unaffected by PPD. Yield component vulnerability due to PPD for three-ear plants was: KNE and KNER > ear number per plant (ENP) > KRNE > WK. Kernel, stalk, and total dry matter yield per plant decreased reciprocally with increasing PPD. Kernel yield per land area increased parabolically up to a maximum yield of 1080 g m–2 at about 10.0 plants m–2, whereas stalk and total dry matter yield increased asymptotically up to 12.5 plants m–2. Shelling percentage was constant with inceasing PPD, but harvest index decerased, though not significantly. We conclude that as PPD pressure is gradually removed over a wide PPD range, yield is adjusted in prolific maize hybrids first by KNE and KNER, followed by ENP, KRNE, and WK, which remained relatively stable.
Received for publication August 10, 1987.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Ma, M. Wen, Y. Guo, B. Li, P.-H. Cournede, and P. de Reffye Parameter Optimization and Field Validation of the Functional-Structural Model GREENLAB for Maize at Different Population Densities Ann. Bot., May 1, 2008; 101(8): 1185 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sarlangue, F. H. Andrade, P. A. Calvino, and L. C. Purcell Why Do Maize Hybrids Respond Differently to Variations in Plant Density? Agron. J., June 5, 2007; 99(4): 984 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Hashemi, S. J. Herbert, and D. H. Putnam Yield Response of Corn to Crowding Stress Agron. J., May 13, 2005; 97(3): 839 - 846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. E. Boccalandro, E. L. Ploschuk, M. J. Yanovsky, R. A. Sanchez, C. Gatz, and J. J. Casal Increased Phytochrome B Alleviates Density Effects on Tuber Yield of Field Potato Crops Plant Physiology, December 1, 2003; 133(4): 1539 - 1546. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Foroutan-pour, P. Dutilleul, and D. L. Smith Inclusion of the Fractal Dimension of Leafless Plant Structure in the Beer-Lambert Law Agron. J., March 1, 2001; 93(2): 333 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jampatong, L.L. Darrah, G.F. Krause, and B.D. Barry Effect of One- and Two-Eared Selection on Stalk Strength and Other Characters in Maize Crop Sci., May 1, 2000; 40(3): 605 - 611. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||