Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1988
Published in Agron J 80:889-892 (1988)
© 1988 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barta, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Barta, A. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Barta, A. L.

Response of Field Grown Alfalfa to Root Waterlogging and Shoot Removal. I. Plant Injury and Carbohydrate and Mineral Content of Roots

A. L. Barta*

Dep. of Agronomy, Ohio Agric. Res. and Dev. Ctr., Wooster, OH 44691.

* Corresponding author.

Shoot removal represents a significant stress to plants, especially forage legumes subjected to frequent harvest. Since it has been reported that alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) injury due to flooding is increased after clipping, this study examined cultivar response and root chemical composition (minerals and carbohydrates) in response to increasing duration of flooding and shoot removal stress. The objective was to characterize physiological responses related to flooding-induced injury. Experiments were conducted on a fine, loamy, mixed mesic Typic Fragiudalf soil that was water saturated for up to 14 d. Young plants of ‘Vernal’ and ‘Answer’ alfalfa were used at the flowering stage of growth. Responses of Vernal and Answer alfalfa were not significantly different from each other in terms of growth or root chemical composition. Shoot removal 2 and 12 d prior to initiation of soil flooding reduced regrowth dry matter accumulation 56 and 33%, respectively. Non-clipped plants were not injured with flooding duration up to 14 d. Root K+ content was significantly reduced by flooding stress only in the clipped treatments. Significant accumulation of Mn+2 or Fe+2 in flooded roots was not observed. Waterlogging had no effect, while clipping significantly reduced root starch concentration. In contrast, concentrations of both sucrose and glucose increased significantly with increased flooding stress for all shoot treatments. However, there was no apparent relationship between availability of soluble carbohydrates, as affected by clipping treatment, and flooding injury. Supply of fermentable carbohydrates does not appear to be limiting for fermentation reactions and is thus probably not a critical factor in flooding tolerance.


Salaries and research support provided by state and federal funds appropriated to the Ohio Agric. Res. and Dev. Ctr., The Ohio State Univ. Journal Article no. 173-87.

Received for publication September 11, 1987.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. L. Barta and R. M. Sulc
Interaction between Waterlogging Injury and Irradiance Level in Alfalfa
Crop Sci., September 1, 2002; 42(5): 1529 - 1534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Agronomy.