Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 1988
Published in Agron J 80:777-784 (1988)
© 1988 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goyne, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schneiter, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goyne, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schneiter, A. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Goyne, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schneiter, A. A.

Temperature and Photoperiod Interactions with the Phenological Development of Sunflower

Philip J. Goyne and A. A. Schneiter*

Queensland Dep. of Primary Industries, Hermitage Res. Stn., Warwick, Queensland 4370 Australia
Dep. of Agronomy, Box 5051, State Univ. Stn., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58505-5051

* Corresponding author.

The synchronization of anthesis of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes to be crossed is important for seed production. Little information is available concerning the interaction of temperature with photoperiod on the phenological development of sunflower. Research was conducted in growth chambers to determine the influence of variations in temperature, photoperiod, and light quantity on the phenological development of 16 sunflower genotypes. The sunflower genotypes were subjected to light treatments of: (i) 12-h fluorescent and incandescent light, (ii) 14-h fluorescent and incandescent light, and (iii) 12-h fluorescent and incandescent light followed by 2-h exposure to incandescent lights only. The fluorescent-incandescent light combination provided a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of about 430 µmol m–2 s–1 in the chambers, whereas that for the incandescent lights alone was 5 µmol m–2 s–1. All light treatments were imposed under day/night temperature regimes of 18/15 and 28/22°C. The light x temperature x genotype interaction was not significant. Light x genotype and temperature x genotype interactions were highly significant for number of days from emergence (VE) to bud visible (R1) and number of leaves at R1. Other significant interactions were temperature x genotype for number of leaves and plant height at R1, and light x genotype for plant height. Some of the genotypes exhibited substantial delay in reaching R1 under the 12-h light treatment, confirming prior observations in greenhouse plantings. Differences in light energy levels had little influence on genotype photoperiodic behavior.


Journal Article no. 1640 of the North Dakota State Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn., Fargo. Sponsored in part by a grant from Pioneer Hi-Bred Int., Inc.

Received for publication September 11, 1987.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Agronomy.