Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 1988
Published in Agron J 80:719-722 (1988)
© 1988 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halvorson, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hartman, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Halvorson, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hartman, G. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Halvorson, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hartman, G. P.

Nitrogen Needs of Sugarbeet Produced with Reduced-Tillage System

A. D. Halvorson* and G. P. Hartman

USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 400, Akron, CO 80720
Montana Agric. Exp. Stn., Sidney, MT 59270

* Corresponding author

Recent studies have shown that sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) can be produced with reduced-tillage systems; however, the effects that reduced-tillage systems may have on N requirements of sugarbeet have not been studied. Therefore, field studies were conducted on a furrow-irrigated silty clay loam soil (Typic Argiboroll) to determine N requirements for optimum sucrose production by sugarbeet grown with reduced-tillage systems. Tillage treatments were conventional tillage (CT), strip tillage (ST), and no-tillage (NT). Four N rates of 0, 56, 112, and 168 kg/ha in 1980 and 1981, and 0, 84, 140, and 196 kg/ha in 1982 were imposed on each of the tillage treatments in a split-plot design. Fertilizer N was applied prior to establishment of tillage treatments In the fall prior to spring sugarbeet planting. Sucrose yields were ST > NT = CT. Application of N significantly increased root yield as well as gross and recoverable sucrose yields, but reduced sucrose content of the sugarbeet root and clear juice purity of all tillage treatments similarly. Except for clear juice purity, tillage x N interactions were not significant when averaged over 3 yr. Therefore, N recommendations formerly developed for yield and quality relationships for sugarbeet produced with conventional tillage can be used to make N recommendations for sugarbeet produced with reduce-tillage systems.


Contribution from the USDA-ARS and the Montana Agric. Exp. Stn., Journal Senes no. 5-2039. This work was supported in part by the Holly Sugar Corp., the Montana-Dakota Beet Growers Assoc., and the Grower-Great Western Joint Res. Comm., Inc.

Received for publication August 24, 1987.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Agronomy.