Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1987
Published in Agron J 79:1-4 (1987)
© 1987 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teare, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kidd, B. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Teare, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kidd, B. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Teare, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kidd, B. T.

Bahiagrass Response to Lime and Nitrogen under Pines1

I. D. Teare, D. L. Wright, R. L. Stanley, Jr. and B. T. Kidd2

The fertilization of slash pine trees (Pinus eliotti Engelm), a practice initiated in the sixties, stimulates bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flügge) production, providing under-canopy forage for the beef cattle industry of the Southeast on sandy, acid soils. Little research has been conducted to determine the production potential of limed and N fertilized bahiagrass growing under pine. The objectives of this research were to measure bahiagrass forage production under slash pine, comparing lime (2.24 Mg ha–1) vs. no lime, four N rates (28, 56, 112, 224, kg ha–1), and to observe changes in extractable soil P, K, and pH on a Norfolk sandy loam (fine-loamy, siliceous, thermic Typic Paleudult). During the 4yr period, application of 2.24 Mg ha–1 lime empirically decreased bahiagrass forage yield under pines when averaged across N levels. Liming at 2.24 Mg ha–1 yr–1 for 4 yr did change the soil pH from 5.0 to 6.1. Nitrogen rates did not affect bahiagrass forage production the first year, but without lime, we found a quadratic response to N rates each year thereafter. The highest yields of bahiagrass forage with lime were obtained with 56 kg ha–1 N. Economic analysis shows the greatest net return ($441 over 4 yr) for no lime at 112 kg ha–1 N and with lime ($211) at 56 kg ha–1 N.

Key Words: Pensacola bahiagrass • Paspalum notatum Flügge • Pinus eliotti Englem • Forage yield • Extractable P • Extractable K • pH


1 Contribution from the Inst. of Food and Agric. Sci., Florida Agric. Exp. Stn., Univ. of Florida, and the North Florida Res. and Educ. Ctr., Quincy, FL 32351. Journal Series no. 6477.

2 Professor, associate professor, and associate professor of Agronomy, and biological scientist II, respectively, Univ. of Flonda

Received for publication May 28, 1985.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society of Agronomy.