Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1985
Published in Agron J 77:851-855 (1985)
© 1985 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cassel, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cassel, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cassel, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, J. R.

Corn Irrigation Scheduling in Humid Regions on Sandy Soils with Tillage Pans1

D. K. Cassel, C. K. Martin and J. R. Lambert2

Several droughts during the past decade in humid regions of the USA, especially the Southeast, have intensified the interest in supplemental irrigation. One objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of supplemental irrigation in a humid environment on corn (Zea mays L.) production on an Atlantic Coastal Plain soil having a tillage pan. A second objective was to evaluate two alternative techniques for scheduling supplemental irrigation in humid regions The study, conducted on a Wagram soil (Arenic Paleudu1ts)-Norfolk soil (Typic Paleudults) from 1979 to 1981, employed a split plot design with water level (irrigation scheduling) as the main block. Water levels were control or dryland (Wl), scheduled irrigation water applications based on a computerized water balance model (W2), and scheduled water applications based on tensiometer measurements (W3). Subplot treatments were time of N application in 1979 and 1980 and cultivation intensity in 1981. Compared with a normal rainfall of 447 mm during the growing season, 464, 262, and 220 mm fell during 1979, 1980, and 1981, respectively. The average amount of irrigation water applied over the 3-yr period based on the water balance model was 40 mm greater than the 3-yr average of 179 mm applied based on the tensiometers. Grain yield as affected by subplot treatment was not significantly different for any year. Mean grain yields for the 3-yr period were 2.58, 7.73, and 8.14 Mg ha–1, for treatments W1, W2, and W3, respectively. Either irrigation scheduling method offers large yield improvements in drier years, but no significant yield difference occurred for the two scheduling techniques. In the wetter year 1979, irrigation increased yield by 2.45 Mg ha–1, whereas in the dryer years of 1980 and 1981 the increases were 6.53 and 7.06 Mg ha-', respectively.

Key Words: Tensiometer • Nitrogen split application • Allowable depletion • Soil water pressure • Rooting depth


1 Contribution from the Dep. of Soil Science, North Carolina State Univ. and Dep. of Agric. Eng., Clemson Univ. Paper no. 9277 of the Journal Series ofthe North Carolina Agric. Res. Service, Raleigh, NC 27695-7619. This study is part of a regional research program supported in part by USDA-ARS through Cooperative Agreement no. 58:7B30-9-77.

2 Professor and assistant professor of soil science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC and professor of agricultural engineering, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC, respectively

Received for publication August 20, 1984.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Agronomy.