Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 1985
Published in Agron J 77:389-392 (1985)
© 1985 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Touchton, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Kabana, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Touchton, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Kabana, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Touchton, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Kabana, R.

Corn Growth and Yield Response to Ethylene Dibromide and Nitrogen1

J. T. Touchton and R. Rodriguez-Kabana2

Even in fields where parasitic nematode populations are low, ethylene dibromide (EDB) will often result in improved plant growth and yields. Visual growth responses to EDB are similar to responses obtained from N fertilizer. The purpose of this field study, which was conducted for 2 years on two Coastal Plain soils (Plinthic Paleudults), was to determine if corn [Zea mays (L.)] growth, nutrient uptake, and yield are influenced by EDB and N interactions. Treatments consisted of a factorial arrangement of N (0 to 269 kg/ha) and EDB (0 to 36 kg/ha) rates replicated eight times in a randomized complete block design. Parasitic nematodes were either nonexistent or exceptionally low. Judging from the persistence of ammonium-N in the soil, EDB was an effective nitrification inhibitor for several weeks after application. The effects of EDB and N on plant populations were not consistent among years and soils; the effects, however, were small and probably not of practical significance. Six weeks after emergence, plant weights and heights generally followed typical N response curves. In three of the four tests, EDB resulted in greater plant heights, and in two of the four tests, EDB resulted in higher plant weights (up to 113%). Applied N had typical effects on earleaf-nutrient concentrations, but EDB did not affect leaf-nutrient concentrations. Grain yields also followed typical N response curves. In all tests, EDB resulted in grain yield increases that ranged from 9 to 26%. Although EDB and N had similar effects on plant growth and yield, there were no interactions between EDB and applied N.

Key Words: EDB • Anhydrous ammonia • Ammonium nitrate • Nematicides • Soilbrom • Nitrification inhibitor • Growth regulator


1 Contribution from Alabama Agnc. Exp. Stn., Auburn University, AL 36849. AAES Journal no. 3-84662.

2 Associate professor, Dep. of Agronomy and Soils and professor, Dep. of Botany, Plant Pathology, and Microbiology, Auburn University, AL 36849.

Received for publication August 27, 1984.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Agronomy.