Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1983
Published in Agron J 75:919-923 (1983)
© 1983 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aparicho-Tejo, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Aparicho-Tejo, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, J. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Aparicho-Tejo, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, J. S.

Magnesium Nutrition and Grain Yield of Maize Having Low Water Potential1

Pedro M. Aparicho-Tejo and John S. Boyer2

Drought decreases plant production but the nutritional status of the plants may alter their susceptibility. Because Mg is a regulatory ion for several aspects of chloroplast photosynthesis, the effect of Mg nutrition on the grain yield of maize (Zea mays L. cv. Dekalb XL43) subjected to a water deficit was examined during most of the grain-filling period. Plants were grown at two soil Mg levels in a controlled environment capable of providing yields comparable to those in the field. The grain yield, shoot and root dry weight, leaf water potential ({Psi}w), and tissue mineral composition were determined. Immediately after tasseling, water was withheld from the soil of half the plants until the {Psi}w had decreased to –1.8 to –2.0 MPa, where it remained until maturity. Low water potentials resulted in a 50% reduction in grain yield and an accelerated leaf senescence. Despite small but significant differences in Mg concentration in roots, stems, and leaves, no differences attributable to differences in Mg nutrition were found in rate of plant dehydration, dry matter accumulation, or grain yield. It is concluded that differences in Mg content of the plant either 1) do not influence response to low – or 2) must be larger than we achieved to see an effect.

Key Words: Zea mays L. • Dry weight • Leaf senescence


1 Contribution from the USDA/ARS, and Dep. of Botany and Dep. of Agronomy, 289 Morill Hall, Univ. of Illinois, 505 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801. This work was supported by funds from National Science Foundation Grant PCM 79-09790 and by the Program of the US-Spanish Joint Committee for Scientific and Technological Cooperation awarded to P.M.A-T

2 Assistant professor, Dep. Fisiologia Vegetal, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain and plant physiologist, USDA/ARS, Dep. of Botany and Dep. of Agronomy, 289 Mom11 Hall, Univ. of Illinois, 505 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801.

Received for publication December 27, 1982.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Agronomy.