Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1983
Published in Agron J 75:134-138 (1983)
© 1983 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, L. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, L. E.

Tolerances of 20 Rice Cultivars to Excess Al and Mn1

Lyle E. Nelson2

Manganese toxicity is a rare occurrence in flooded or paddy rice (Oryza saliva L.); however, this is not the case for upland rice grown on aerobic soils. Although acid upland soils may contain toxic levels of both Al and Mn, cultivar tolerances to excess Al and Mn do not necessarily coincide. These studies were to determine whether a procedure could be devised for rapid screening of rice cultivars for tolerances to excess Mn and to correlate tolerances between excess Al and excess Mn. Nine rice cultivars were grown in a greenhouse for 4 weeks in nutrient solutions containing 1 µg·cm–3 and 80 µg·cm–3 Mn. The relative tolerance was expressed as a ratio of the excess Mn treatment to the optimum or control treatment using weights of plant parts, height, root length, and tiller number. These expressions of relative tolerance to excess Mn were used to rank the nine cultivars. These rankings were then compared to a ranking based on previous results obtained at IRRI when the cultivars were grown on an acid soil. Significant Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were observed between rankings for tolerance to acid soil toxicity and relative root weight (r8 = –0.93**, significant at the 0.01 level) and relative tiller number (r8 = –0.68*, significant at the 0.05 level). Other rank correlations with acid soil toxicity were not significant. Subsequently, 20 cultivars were screened for tolerance to excess Mn by growing them in a greenhouse for 4 weeks in solutions containing 0.5 and 80 µg·cm–3 Mn. These cultivars were also screened for tolerance to excess Al by growing them for 3 weeks at 3 and 30 µg·cm–3 Al. The correlation between tolerances to excess Al and Mn was tested using relative root length for Al and relative shoot weight for Mn. The correlations were not significant. Large differences in tolerance to excess Mn were observed among rice cultivars; however, it was not established that screening trials using soils containing excess amounts of available Mn can be replaced by short-term screening in nutrient solutions. The results of this study clearly indicate that tolerance to excess Al is not necessarily correlated with tolerance to excess Mn.

Key Words: Oryza saliva L. • Mn concentration • Relative shoot weight • Relative root length


1 Joint contribution from the Mississippi Agric. and Forestry Exp. Stn., Mississippi State, MS 39762 (Journal No. 4892) and the Int. Rice Res. Inst., Los Baños, Philippines. This is a report of research conducted while the author was on sabbatical leave at IRRI, August 1978–July 1979, and supported in part by a NSF Scientists and Engineers in Economic Development grant. This report was presented before Div. S-4, Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. on 3 Dec. 1980, Detroit, Mich.

2 Professor and agronomist.

Received for publication July 13, 1981.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Agronomy.