Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1983
Published in Agron J 75:13-16 (1983)
© 1983 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shalhevet, J.
Right arrow Articles by Meir, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shalhevet, J.
Right arrow Articles by Meir, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shalhevet, J.
Right arrow Articles by Meir, T.

Potato Irrigation Requirements in a Hot Climate Using Sprinkler and Drip Methods1

J. Shalhevet, D. Shimshi and T. Meir2

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is a heat- and drought-sensitive crop, which in hot climates usually requires large water applications for optimum production. Irrigation water in Israel is both limiting in quantity and high in price; thus it is critical to know the water requirement of the crop, as well as how to improve irrigation efficiency. Field experiments were conducted in the Negev (arid) region of Israel on a Typic Camborthid soil to determine the water production functions of potatoes (‘Desiree’) under drip and sprinkler irrigation. Irrigation treatments were based on Class A pan evaporation. The linear production functions relating total yield in metric ton ha-1 to seasonal water application depth (W) in cm were, for sprinkler irrigation: Y = -23.5+1.19W, and for drip irrigation: Y = -12.8+1.14W. Similar total maximum yields were obtained with about 8 % less water with the drip as with the sprinkler method (not statistically significant). A single production function for both methods described the yield of marketable tubers: Y = -40.0+1.28W. These functions apply in the relative water application range (water applied over Class A pan evaporation) of 0.3 to 1.0, at which point the function reaches a plateau. Yield was reduced by 12% as soil water potential in the 0 to 0.6 m depth increment changed from -20 to -29 J kg-1 for sprinkler irrigation. Under drip irrigation the soil could dry to -40 J kg-1 without yield reduction, as long as the water supply was adequate. This was explained by the higher root concentration under drip than under sprinkler irrigation.

Key Words: Water production functions • Soil water potential • Soil temperature • Root distribution • Solanum tuberosum L.


1 Contribution from the Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel. Paper No. 288-E, 1981 series.

2 Senior scientists and agronomist, respectively, Institute of Soils and Water, ARO, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel.

Received for publication November 19, 1981.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Agronomy.