Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1982
Published in Agron J 74:1081-1083 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Varvel, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Varvel, G. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Varvel, G. E.

The Effects of Anhydrous Ammonia at Planting Time on Spring Wheat and Barley1

G. E. Varvel2

Anhydrous ammonia has become the main N source used in the northern Great Plains on small grains, but most of it is applied in the fall preceding the crop year. This practice has been used for convenience, to avoid moisture loss which can occur in the spring due to the depth of placement, and to avoid possible germination damage from the anhydrous application if small grains are planted immediately after injection.

The present studies were conducted to determine the effect of anhydrous ammonia on spring wheat, Triticum aestivum L., and barley, Hordeum vulgare L., at planting time.

Field experiments were conducted 1979-1981 on a Wheatville loam (coarse-silty over clayey, frigid Aerie Calciaquolls) soil. The treatments consisted of three rates of N as anhydrous ammonia (45, 90, and 135 kg/ha) in 1979 and four rates of N (0, 45, 90, and 135 kg/ha) in 1980-1981 at three depths (8,16, and 24 cm) in all combinations. Spring wheat and barley were then seeded at three different times. Seedling stand counts, grain yield, and protein were used to determine the effect of the treatments.

Seedling stands were reduced in some cases, but no reduction in grain yield or protein was obtained due to the reduction in stand. The most important factor in spring anhydrous application was the depth of application, which caused greater moisture loss and seedbed disruption at the 24-cm application depth. Significant responses to N were obtained, but N as anhydrous ammonia did not cause reduction in seedling stands of agronomic importance.

Key Words: Seedling stand • Protein content • Triticum aestivumHordeum vulgare L.


1 Contribution of the Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn., Paper No. 12,102 Scientific Journal Series.

2 Assistant professor, Northwest Exp. Stn., Univ. of Minnesota, Crookston, MN 56716.

Received for publication March 17, 1982.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. Matus, F. Walley, G. Hnatowich, C. van Kessel, and J.D. Knight
Use of Anhydrous Ammonia in Single-Pass Seeding Operations of Spring Wheat at Varied Landscape Positions
Agron. J., November 1, 1999; 91(6): 969 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Agronomy.